Post AR5gGDvOmLDe8O0Upk by balan@freespeechextremist.com
(DIR) More posts by balan@freespeechextremist.com
(DIR) Post #AQsBqxoa0zthFbNTVI by SerfnUSA@poa.st
2022-12-22T18:24:38.117443Z
63 likes, 30 repeats
Before we had our first kid none of my wife’s over half dozen married white female colleagues in their 20’s and early 30’s had kids. Within a year of the birth most of them were pregnant, and we just learned the last holdout is now with child, they’re ALL having kids. It can’t be overstated how socially motivated women are, if you can start a positive trend they’ll fall in line just as easily as they’ve fallen in line with every negative trend the system puts out.
(DIR) Post #AQsC5WwyBC9gH7FQRs by udongle@mugicha.club
2022-12-22T18:27:16.136819Z
25 likes, 0 repeats
Geez serf you really get around :JahySmug: :JahyScared:
(DIR) Post #AQsCDjmyKTb4PVU824 by SerfnUSA@poa.st
2022-12-22T18:28:45.051929Z
18 likes, 0 repeats
@udongle 😂 please don’t read it that way
(DIR) Post #AQsCNJSd4UGjeQXGnA by PvtProperty@poa.st
2022-12-22T18:30:29.134158Z
15 likes, 0 repeats
@SerfnUSA Yes absolutely. This is also why I avoid talking about politics with women. It only makes them think you're low status if you disagree with narratives.
(DIR) Post #AQsDyI41KO59zHDlxo by AlbinoMutant@poa.st
2022-12-22T18:48:22.533289Z
9 likes, 1 repeats
@SerfnUSA The kings gotta keep the queen bees in the line, and the queen bees will keep the rest of the ladies in line.
(DIR) Post #AQtUFeTR3QgCq1Mx4y by Curvin@poa.st
2022-12-23T09:25:30.234596Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@SerfnUSA Huh.
(DIR) Post #AQw16xS0oYAZtL5MRM by D-Droid@poa.st
2022-12-24T14:43:07.136668Z
6 likes, 0 repeats
@SerfnUSA extreme woman moment in the community
(DIR) Post #AQw94MLKbmSjrGETce by RetardedServantOfChrist@urchan.org
2022-12-24T16:12:01.554252Z
4 likes, 0 repeats
Ok now teach them to STFU and I’ll be impressed lmao
(DIR) Post #AQwAQxRjRL4NFyZ9Hs by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T16:27:34.785114Z
7 likes, 0 repeats
@SerfnUSA you are absolutely correct -we men really cannot fathom the degree to which women compete with each other, an indicator it seems of polygyny being the natural (and for women, preferred) relationship structure. from Artisanal Toad https://archive.ph/Aw5Fa , With 3 or 4 wives, they form their own “herd” and they police each other. That alone turns the hypergamy on its head. The structure of the marriage makes the husband more dominant and the women more submissive. In a monogamous marriage the wife can withhold sex, complain, nag and engage in passive aggressive tactics to get what she wants. Not so in a polygynous marriage. What she wants is her husband’s attention and the only way to get it is to give him what he wants: a sweet, feminine, submissive and sexually available wife.turning hypergamy to husbands’ advantage -talk about a positive trend.
(DIR) Post #AQwBDvp6GNhSPcqgDI by Eiregoat@nicecrew.digital
2022-12-24T16:33:51.209349Z
24 likes, 8 repeats
The problem with polygyny is that it creates a few very reproductive chads who are highly incentivised to protect society and work to sustain it, and a LOT of incels who have the opposite incentive.It's why countries like pakistan end up so rapey and backward: it's in most men's interest to work as little as possible and take women by deception and force.Then eventually they come up against a highly productive monogamous society and get steamrolled because the other guys have thousands of mids working their ass off and churning out steel weapons because they get laid every single week without fail and have five kids each.
(DIR) Post #AQwC7Ij6oJjhNBRrzk by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T16:46:25.944986Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@Eiregoat @SerfnUSA >Then eventually they come up against a highly productive monogamous society and get steamrolled because the other guys have thousands of mids working their ass off and churning out steel weapons because they get laid every single week without fail and have five kids each.i've heard this argument before and i find it less & less convincing over time.firstly, where is such a society as you reference above? name one, where.2ndly, it strikes me that not every man is capable of herding cats in the sense of running a polygynous marriage, taking the extreme degree of responsibility for wives that Scripture calls for, so it's not as if it would be an expectation for every marriage-aged man, or even as you correctly point out a real possibility. a society permissible of Biblical polygyny united in Biblical/cultural fraternity would not feature incels with that opposite incentive you reference above.whattya think? sophistry?
(DIR) Post #AQwCXfwR7WswtzG6GO by PvtProperty@poa.st
2022-12-24T16:51:12.329839Z
13 likes, 1 repeats
@Eiregoat @RMIV @SerfnUSA Polygamy is what we have right now and its really fucking up society pretty bad.
(DIR) Post #AQwCj4t0iVERS65qa0 by Eiregoat@nicecrew.digital
2022-12-24T16:53:07.688975Z
6 likes, 0 repeats
Right? Polygamy is even worse than polygyny in that there isn't even an apex for men to aspire to. They tend to turn into matriarchies with no one doing much of anything and men doing the bare minimum to support themselves and some kids that may or may not actually be theirs.
(DIR) Post #AQwCtCcOp95iKR9RsO by Free_Idealist@poa.st
2022-12-24T16:55:05.503730Z
9 likes, 2 repeats
@RMIV @SerfnUSA Polygamy is just a perverted sexual fantasy. No, it's not preferred by women. No, it's not good for women. No, it's not good for the children. And no, it is certainly not natural. One man, one woman. That's how marriage was intended when God gave Eve to Adam, and that's how it ought to be today.
(DIR) Post #AQwCyZSfK0AScg9sR6 by PvtProperty@poa.st
2022-12-24T16:56:03.966855Z
7 likes, 0 repeats
@Eiregoat @RMIV @SerfnUSA Marriage, after race, is the most essential mechanism of keeping social function. Now that everyone is a "serial monogamist" (same basic structure as polygamy) all the guys are completely demoralized. Even right wing incels still usually dislike society and want to tear it down.
(DIR) Post #AQwDEptRzmWsDeRV8C by SuperSnekFriend@poa.st
2022-12-24T16:59:00.132992Z
3 likes, 0 repeats
@Free_Idealist @RMIV @SerfnUSA Based!
(DIR) Post #AQwDPGX9nm8HjrzKi0 by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:00:53.349676Z
5 likes, 0 repeats
@PvtProperty @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA neither his Pakistan example, or anywhere in the West for that matter, are Christian countries.>pictured: graphs describing unfettered hypergamy in a society of male-female social parity, aka an un-Biblical society.
(DIR) Post #AQwDeJSpBq2VAc8XzM by PvtProperty@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:03:36.594735Z
7 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA Polygyny did not work for the Mormons either. They were incentivized to kick out young adult boys to go try and convert Californian people and use them as missionaries. There were too many men and not enough women. If God was okay with polygamy he wouldnt have given us a 50/50 birth ratio
(DIR) Post #AQwDu5BG3x69VLRKO8 by MechaSilvio@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:06:27.380602Z
8 likes, 2 repeats
@RMIV @SerfnUSA How can multiple wives compete with the Working Site?
(DIR) Post #AQwDuI2sER7FP6cJcm by YTFoidLover1488@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:06:29.846712Z
3 likes, 0 repeats
@PvtProperty @RMIV @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA I knew a guy that fit this description they are now one of the worst first wave of OG Reddit communist trannies
(DIR) Post #AQwDzKkxZzlXGBdveq by PvtProperty@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:07:24.544708Z
4 likes, 0 repeats
@YTFoidLover1488 @RMIV @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA Makes sense. Why would you stay a Mormon if Mormon society literally refuses to make a place for you in itself
(DIR) Post #AQwEScstG991sfJu8u by johnbudd1350@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:12:42.090174Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@Eiregoat @RMIV @SerfnUSA > thousands of mids Best name I've heard for the middle class lmao
(DIR) Post #AQwEUmtD211JUSV3FA by mmmfeet@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:08:51.856747Z
13 likes, 1 repeats
@RMIV @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA women in polygamous relationships commit a level of abuse against the children of their sister wives that would make most rapists and murderers blush
(DIR) Post #AQwElBDYLcyzZlpe0e by captain_arepa@ck.cachapa.xyz
2022-12-24T17:15:01.341Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@PvtProperty@poa.st @Eiregoat@nicecrew.digital @RMIV@poa.st @SerfnUSA@poa.st We're basically back to the tribal ages, but with technology and some extra perks :02_think2:
(DIR) Post #AQwElIYj3J4uLSn9U0 by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:16:04.396072Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@PvtProperty @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA i) Mormons are not Christians.If God was okay with polygamy he wouldnt have given us a 50/50 birth ratioii) this implies that everyone of that 50/50 (actually more women are born than men so it’s more like 49/51, 48/52) can & do get married. since we all feature roughly twice as many female ancestors as male we also know this is not the case.iii) God is okay with polygyny, the number of men in the Bible with multiple wives is, at minimum, a whole whole lot. many people claim it’s a sin, but that disagrees with Scripture: :bible_wh: Romans 4:15 says “Where there is no law there is no transgression” and :bible_wh: Romans 5:13 says “where there is no law there is no sin imputed.” not only is there no law prohibiting polygyny, but rather exactly the opposite: God regulated polygyny in the Law in the same way He regulated farming. God does not regulate sin, He prohibits and condemns it. in fact, look at :bible_wh: Jeremiah 31:31-32, where God said He was married to both Israel and Judah. to claim having more than one wife is wrong is to claim God did something wrong… Christian, you probably don’t want to go there.
(DIR) Post #AQwEnD8GCTcG5qKCFk by captain_arepa@ck.cachapa.xyz
2022-12-24T17:16:24.889Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@PvtProperty@poa.st @Eiregoat@nicecrew.digital @RMIV@poa.st @SerfnUSA@poa.st We're basically back to the tribal ages, but with technology and some extra perks :02_think2:
(DIR) Post #AQwEr3J8fZjWmVFFFg by SerfnUSA@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:17:06.807499Z
12 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @PvtProperty @Eiregoat The early European farmers that the monogamous aryans steamrolled were polygamous. It’s harder to find examples from more recent history that are as scientific since you can make the claim that the losers lost because of racial or technological disparity. But these things all go together. Low IQ races = nations that don’t make technological developments = societies that fail to realize that polygamy is stupid.
(DIR) Post #AQwEw0ehxQOu0IhIzg by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:18:00.698812Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@mmmfeet @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA are they Christian wives, married to a Christian husband, to whom they submit absolutely in all things?
(DIR) Post #AQwF5E0lfcKC24PU9Y by branman65@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:19:40.726880Z
7 likes, 0 repeats
@Eiregoat @RMIV @SerfnUSA Polygamy encourages civil wars and insurrection.
(DIR) Post #AQwF9rmBldmsWFnuPg by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:20:30.981791Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@SerfnUSA @PvtProperty @Eiregoat >early European farmers that the monogamous aryans steamrolled were polygamous.and they were not Christian.
(DIR) Post #AQwFBfhRdeXbdyRhZI by merchantHelios@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:20:47.314087Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA the NT is very very clear about God's opinions on how many people should be in a marriage
(DIR) Post #AQwFHRNHoP8Kx7leqm by mmmfeet@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:21:47.544623Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA This feels like purity spiraling tbh
(DIR) Post #AQwFVMG1dN6Z8W0Xqa by NotImportant@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:24:23.873099Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@SerfnUSA @RMIV @PvtProperty @Eiregoat Early Ireland is an exception to this. One of the main reasons they were able to beat back the Norman's was because Irish rulers usually had several wives and if a ruler died he had enough kids to replace him, while the Normans in Ireland we're constantly stuck with child rulers or just the end of their blood line. I do believe it only applied to rulers and priests, I don't think the average Irish was a polygamist.This can easily be the exception proving the rule.
(DIR) Post #AQwFVlvMCq1MjwXPF2 by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:24:28.464810Z
3 likes, 0 repeats
@mmmfeet @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA how so? i am reading Scripture.
(DIR) Post #AQwFmQOnUOlau6FUPI by merchantHelios@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:27:28.762536Z
3 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @PvtProperty @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA"So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate"Matthew 19:6 "But from the beginning of creation, ‘God made them male and female.’ ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.’ So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.” Mark 10:6-9"But because of the temptation to sexual immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband." 1 Corinthians 7:2Idk man, I feel like God couldn't possibly be more clear on this one!
(DIR) Post #AQwFnxpKgrRKruOWSO by MiketheLeaf@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:26:00.542023Z
6 likes, 1 repeats
@RMIV @SerfnUSA Everyone who advocates for polygamy would be getting zero pussy in a legalized polygamous society.
(DIR) Post #AQwFzYJHO619ChvZom by Free_Idealist@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:29:51.508845Z
4 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @PvtProperty @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA >b-b-but the kikes did it!Subversive degenerate bullshit. Every instance of polygamy in the Bible is easily refuted with the words of Christ: From the beginning it was not so. Adam and Eve. Not Adam and Eve, Stacy, Elizabeth, etc. It's really not a hard concept to follow. You're doing exactly the sort of shit kikes and their father do; You're twisting scripture to justify behavior that runs contrary to God's design.>look at Jeremiah 31:31-32, where God said He was married to both Israel and Judah. to claim having more than one wife is wrong is to claim God did something wrongNo, it's not. God's marriage to those two nations is not marriage as it is for a man and a woman. When a man and woman marry, what happens? Genesis 2:24 - "Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh." One wife. One marriage. One flesh.
(DIR) Post #AQwG0pJLfC0sDnZFOS by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:30:05.202695Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@NotImportant @SerfnUSA @PvtProperty @Eiregoat biblical polygyny may well be permitted for kings & other rulers but not for priests/shepherd of the flock. it is pretty clear from :bible_wh: 1 Timothy 3:1-4 This is a true saying: If a man desire the office of a Bishop, he desireth a good worke. A Bishop then must be blamelesse, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behauiour, giuen to hospitalitie, apt to teach; Not giuen to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre, but patient, not a brawler, not couetous; One that ruleth well his owne house, hauing his children in subiection with all grauitie.
(DIR) Post #AQwGCkCUUSd1qX2hns by dharmadudebro@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:32:14.528834Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@Free_Idealist @RMIV @PvtProperty @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA For most of the LDS Churches' history polygamy has been grounds for excommunication so arguing for polygamy on religious grounds will always be a dead end idea.
(DIR) Post #AQwGGm9dASt143cx3Q by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:32:58.176744Z
2 likes, 1 repeats
@MiketheLeaf @SerfnUSA in a society of un-Biblical male/female social parity, i agree with you, for it is what we presently have.
(DIR) Post #AQwGN597TBnphhOZ2e by mmmfeet@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:33:45.406057Z
4 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA Even if the Bible doesn't strictly forbid polygamy, it doesn't mean we have to submit to it. One Man + One Woman is an incredibly powerful social structure that gives men a *chance* at having a wife that they wouldn't otherwise have and ensures women dont have to share their husband with a bunch of other women. It's a social order that gives everyone, men women and children, the most dignity.
(DIR) Post #AQwGWMoT9bX96SACp6 by NotImportant@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:35:47.231542Z
3 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @SerfnUSA @PvtProperty @Eiregoat Irish Christianity was separate from the rest of Church and it was expected of priests to have multiple wives. Most of the times when Irish priest took white sacrifice (self imposed exile) it was bringing all their wives and starting a new monastery on some small island somewhere.
(DIR) Post #AQwGfI1ML9QYqZRoBs by SerfnUSA@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:37:23.821038Z
8 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @PvtProperty @Eiregoat A plain reading of scripture seems to me to reveal that God considers polygamy to be allowable and necessary in some circumstances due to the nature of the sinful and fallen world, but monogamy is the ideal (Adam and Eve) because polygamy constantly leads to strife. It’s only mandated when a man’s brother has died without an heir, he’s obligated to take his widow as his wife and give his brother an heir, which is obviously a financial responsibility in response to tragedy not the ideal societal norm. And very telling is that most notable instances of polygamy in scripture are the result of sin or result in sin, if not catastrophe. Abraham and Sarah doubting Gods promise resulted in the creation of Arabs. Jacob’s polygamy is a result of Laban’s deception. The desire for one particular extra wife caused David to sin (and his polygamous family structure leads directly to civil war), Solomon’s wives caused him to sin. To say polygamy is expressly condemned by scripture would be a bit of a stretch, but to say that scripture condones it, that it’s the biblical way to live, is a much greater reach.
(DIR) Post #AQwHAg6GrddSVKiD1E by NotImportant@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:43:04.431201Z
4 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @SerfnUSA @PvtProperty @Eiregoat Due to Ireland not have economic zones like cities at the time, monasteries would take their place and the Bishop would act as any ruler would, but was expected to have quite verbose religious knowledge. It was also at this time that many Irish priests would be known to travel the world to advise other Christian nations in the way of the faith. It was until some time later after a wave of what the Roman Church deemed secularism in Ireland that pressure was put on the Irish church to become truly a part of the Church.Part of this was no doubt political on the Pope's part seeing as these Irish bishops expected more respect from the Pope than the Pope thought necessary.
(DIR) Post #AQwHUEbMoQet0ka9ku by SuperSnekFriend@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:46:36.262693Z
4 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @NotImportant @SerfnUSA @PvtProperty @Eiregoat >biblical polygamy may well be permitted for kings & other rulers but not for priests/shepherd of the flock. It was not permitted for the kings. That God did not constantly punishment David for polygamy is not relevant to the impact and universality of the law and if you read 2 Samuel carefully, David's polygamy did cause issues, both for himself, his wives, and eventual his son, Solomon."15 you may indeed set a king over you whom the LORD your God will choose. One from among your brothers you shall set as king over you. You may not put a foreigner over you, who is not your brother... 17 And he shall not acquire many wives for himself, lest his heart turn away..." (Deuteronomy 17:15-17)
(DIR) Post #AQwHfeg8CR9P4YFxTc by PorkCow@freespeechextremist.com
2022-12-24T17:48:40.566115Z
3 likes, 0 repeats
@branman65 @Eiregoat @RMIV @SerfnUSA This is the best case for polygamy I've ever heard, but still not worth 90% of decent men being selected out of the gene pool for not worshipping MTV and jews or however the fuck female selection works.
(DIR) Post #AQwI8jw5jQEDmAafAm by branman65@poa.st
2022-12-24T17:53:55.642283Z
3 likes, 0 repeats
@PorkCow @Eiregoat @RMIV @SerfnUSA So you want to live in Pakistan where there are biweekly terror attacks
(DIR) Post #AQwIvyA7cwte5UcxlY by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:02:49.312889Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@merchantHelios @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA finally someone challenges me Scripturally.:bible_wh: 1st Peter 3:7 Likewise ye husbands, dwel with them according to knowledge, giuing honour vnto the wife as vnto the weaker vessel, and as being heires together of the grace of life, that your prayers be not hindered. notice he said them (plural).:bible_wh: Ephesians 5:24-28 Therefore as the Church is subiect vnto Christ, so let the wiues bee to their owne husbands in euery thing. Husbands, loue your wiues, euen as Christ also loued the Church, and gaue himselfe for it: That he might sanctifie & cleanse it with the washing of water, by the word, That hee might present it to himselfe a glorious Church, not hauing spot or wrinckle, or any such thing: but that it should bee holy and without blemish. So ought men to loue their wiues, as their owne bodies: hee that loueth his wife, loueth himselfe.again, plural.further we have so many examples of Biblical men who had multiple wives. and in King David & King Solomon’s case, many wives. oh and about King David’s polygyny, :bible_wh: 2 Samuel 12:7-12 And Nathan said to Dauid, Thou art the man: thus saith the Lord God of Israel, I anointed thee king ouer Israel, and I deliuered thee out of the hand of Saul, And I gaue thee thy Masters house, and thy Masters wiues into thy bosome, and gaue thee the house of Israel and of Iudah, and if that had bene too litle, I would moreouer haue giuen vnto thee such and such things. Wherefore hast thou despised the commandement of the Lord, to doe euill in his sight? thou hast killed Uriah the Hittite with the sword, and hast taken his wife to be thy wife, and hast slaine him with the sword of the children of Ammon. Now therefore the sword shall neuer depart from thine house, because thou hast despised me, and hast taken the wife of Uriah the Hittite, to be thy wife. Thus saith the Lord, Behold, I will raise vp euill against thee out of thine owne house, and I will take thy wiues before thine eyes, and giue them vnto thy neighbour, and he shall lie with thy wiues in the sight of this Sunne. For thou diddest it secretly: but I will do this thing before all Israel, and before the Sunne.and nowhere in there is the sin found to be David’s polygyny, in fact we see in Verse 8 that God would have given David even more wives, if he had but asked.further, God himself had 2 wives, those being Israel & Judah.and finally, :bible_wh: Romans 4:15 and :bible_wh: Romans 5:13 are clear- if God did not prohibit something in His Law, it isn’t Sin. that isn’t to say it isn’t sin for a particular person whatever is not from faith is sin and to one who knows the right thing to do and does not do it, to him it is sin, but those are personal issues between the individual and the Holy Spirit and the brother is NOT to be judged over such issues ( :bible_wh: Romans 14:4). to say or suggest that an Apostle in the New Testament “changed” the Law is incorrect because that would have them in violation of :bible_wh: Deuteronomy 4:2 and 12:32 You shall not add to the word I am commanding you, nor take away from it, that you may keep the commandments of the Lord your God which I command you and Whatever I command you, you shall be careful to do; you shall not add to nor take away from it.so i see where you’re coming from in your reading bro but Scripture disagrees as far as i can see, as your take requires leaving a considerable portion of Scripture out.
(DIR) Post #AQwJEHQgjNXr3Y6ifI by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:06:08.014674Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@mmmfeet @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA i am not arguing against monogamy nor am i suggesting that Scripture commands every Christian man should practice polygyny.
(DIR) Post #AQwJPcHRY2rOuSBlM8 by PorkCow@freespeechextremist.com
2022-12-24T18:08:11.253919Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@branman65 @Eiregoat @RMIV @SerfnUSA If Paki terror is a muslim problem, that would explain the civilian casualties. And if it's a jew problem, then the only solution is to spread them thin by attacking them in as many countries at once. (But no, regardless of war I don't think I'd willingly live anywhere in the turban hemisphere even if I was a soudi oil prince.)If silly times did break out in the States, it would be a war on groomers. Even fenceshitters seem sympathetic to our wiemar concerns now that they're seeing it in the flesh.
(DIR) Post #AQwJc2VZrJgdjGivI0 by branman65@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:10:25.768039Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@PorkCow @Eiregoat @RMIV @SerfnUSA So you want to die in a bombing done in the name of some irrelevant minority ethnicity you barely think or know about that’s at war with the government
(DIR) Post #AQwJn2uehAymAXha40 by PorkCow@freespeechextremist.com
2022-12-24T18:12:25.314035Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@branman65 @Eiregoat @RMIV @SerfnUSA No, but I'd die to save my people from faggots. Pakis being less uppity or whatever would just be a nice bonus.
(DIR) Post #AQwJz0cv1LfuYP6tQu by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:14:34.735258Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@SerfnUSA @PvtProperty @Eiregoat but to say that scripture condones it, that it’s the biblical way to live, is a much greater reach.friend you are wrong here. in each of your examples above, it is not the polygyny that angered God, and was therefore sin.David took another man’s wife and thereby committed adultery but further attempted to do it on the sly. the polygyny was not the sin.King Solomon had 700 wives, right? and it was those foreign wives he took, race-mixing being a violation of the 7th Commandement, and that he allowed them to turn his heart away from God. the polygyny was not the sin.
(DIR) Post #AQwJzcUkEBiQ03Zty4 by branman65@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:14:41.417319Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@PorkCow @Eiregoat @RMIV @SerfnUSA With polygamy you’ll be forced to endure eternal beta uprising that never ends
(DIR) Post #AQwKB4yOgdIvVcublA by PorkCow@freespeechextremist.com
2022-12-24T18:16:45.920436Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@branman65 @Eiregoat @RMIV @SerfnUSA Yeah, that's why it's the less attractive option. If I could boog without the help of mormans I'd just do it.
(DIR) Post #AQwKKaPNBHr7br3y52 by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:18:28.683725Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@SuperSnekFriend @NotImportant @SerfnUSA @PvtProperty @Eiregoat okay i am reproved in this case.and it makes sense that rulers & shepherds of the flock should be so limited, as they’d need brothers at their sides rather than knives at their backs, so to speak.
(DIR) Post #AQwKZGHMIs9RWWJPvc by branman65@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:21:07.918305Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@PorkCow @Eiregoat @RMIV @SerfnUSA That’s why polygamy is bad and should never be practiced
(DIR) Post #AQwKlMcCZUSceLpeXg by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:23:19.052866Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@branman65 @PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA with the erasure of male/female social parity, there would be no betas as far as women are concerned, or so few as to be immaterial (omega males don’t get married in any era).it’s an order we can scarcely imagine, having grown up when/where we have.
(DIR) Post #AQwKt9NhesqxvFlOV6 by merchantHelios@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:24:43.213772Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA ...you do realize that two people (one man, one woman) *is* plural, right?Also, please don't respond with that letter switching around. It makes your posts excruciatingly annoying to read and distracts from what you're trying to sayI do think you're conflating God's prohibition of man adding or taking away from the law, and His fulfillment of prophecy in the new Testament with the new commandments Christians are under after the resurrection. That said, I'm not going to take the time to respond to the rest of this since I am preparing for family to come into town later today. I wish you the best friend, enjoy time with your loved ones
(DIR) Post #AQwKwr9pM8PqYp2Ynx by branman65@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:25:23.749240Z
5 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA Polygamy is a coomer fantasy. God created 1 man and 1 woman
(DIR) Post #AQwL2ah5ToxJEmKdQu by SuperSnekFriend@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:26:25.695999Z
4 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @NotImportant @SerfnUSA @PvtProperty @Eiregoat Ha! Not reproved, just clarified. :02heart: Christian kings are meant to be the most God-like of their people and pastors the most Christ-like, and monogamous marriage was made precisely because the family unit is the very image of God (Genesis 1:27, Ephesians 5:28-32), hence why both kings and ministers must be strive for God's call of monogamy. That is why sexual sin is so serious and disgusting to the Lord.
(DIR) Post #AQwL8izJYXKChLmYbI by DEERBLOOD@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:27:32.421323Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@SuperSnekFriend @RMIV @NotImportant @SerfnUSA @PvtProperty @Eiregoat That and succession problems
(DIR) Post #AQwLCg3iO7Q4lwj1yS by SuperSnekFriend@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:28:15.039579Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@RMIV @NotImportant @SerfnUSA @PvtProperty @Eiregoat Oh, I forgot a wholesome picture to go with that post:
(DIR) Post #AQwLDBtC2m17Ua3516 by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:28:20.792194Z
4 likes, 2 repeats
@PorkCow @branman65 @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA women are property of Fathers then Husbands, Biblically speaking, and in such an order they would not worship MTV or jews, as you say, they would look up to those males in their immediate vicinity who have power and would worship as they do.this is why, when Fathers fall away from the Faith, the children inevitably do so.
(DIR) Post #AQwLFxffMZOcGR2hoO by Eiregoat@nicecrew.digital
2022-12-24T18:27:35.447887Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
The ancient Irish did have multiple wives, but I suspect that was to offset the fact that they were constantly engaging in low-level warfare with their neighbours, so there was constantly a surplus of women.The social contract still worked out because the peasants still had at least one wife and the rulers just soaked up the excess.However, it also has to be noted that they got far too comfortable and (like the gauls and the britons) didn't keep up with military advances of their time despite being wealthy and educated. There's a lot of factors that could have contributed to this, but polygyny can't be ignored as potentially one of them.
(DIR) Post #AQwLMnyRoaLwDT5gx6 by branman65@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:30:05.138907Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA Well if eternal beta uprising is what you want than that’s your funeral nigger
(DIR) Post #AQwLni4TrwH7jCk3vs by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:34:56.833844Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@branman65 @PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA if you don't like what Scripture has to say, that's between you & God.your take is not comprehensive because to leave it at>God created 1 man and 1 womanis to say that the Bible contains antinomies. Scripture does not contain antinomies.
(DIR) Post #AQwLqFHhM18PJf8Kpc by Eiregoat@nicecrew.digital
2022-12-24T18:33:10.988788Z
3 likes, 0 repeats
Even betas need a stake in society, familial authority is a very good motivator for men.
(DIR) Post #AQwLyR2LXihQ59rFQm by SerfnUSA@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:36:52.997246Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @PvtProperty @Eiregoat Well I don’t agree but blessedly this is not a life or soul endangering issue for either of us so I’m comfortable agreeing to disagree and parting ways as friends.
(DIR) Post #AQwM2bjViUWePk2MWu by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:37:38.341095Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@merchantHelios @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA please don’t respond with that letter switching around.i’m not sure what you mean by this.you too dude, have a good ‘un.
(DIR) Post #AQwM8yOwLjm0SKS0o4 by Eiregoat@nicecrew.digital
2022-12-24T18:37:11.975279Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
> firstly, where is such a society as you reference above? name one, where.Honestly, pretty much every society big enough to mount a foreign expedition prior to the 20th century.British Empire, French Empire, Swedish Empire, Russian Empire, Empire of Japan etc.Pretty much all of them have monogamy (or *very* limited polygyny) as their core reproductive model.> 2ndly, it strikes me that not every man is capable of herding cats in the sense of running a polygynous marriage, taking the extreme degree of responsibility for wives that Scripture calls for, so it's not as if it would be an expectation for every marriage-aged man, or even as you correctly point out a real possibility. a society permissible of Biblical polygyny united in Biblical/cultural fraternity would not feature incels with that opposite incentive you reference above.We have a modern example though: Islamic societies. And that is the actual result, a few men with a lot of wives and a lot of men with non. Lots of rape, low productivity and generally they fall behind the more monogamous societies.
(DIR) Post #AQwMOI9tAuCu4kiPEu by RetardedServantOfChrist@urchan.org
2022-12-24T18:40:36.416566Z
5 likes, 0 repeats
Imagine wanting multiple women. I can’t even deal with the one I have half the time.
(DIR) Post #AQwMTWjYPbFcjBtSoS by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:42:30.247711Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Eiregoat @SerfnUSA islamic societies are not Christian. polygyny anywhere would be limited as most men can neither handle the concomitant responsibility nor maybe could afford it.nowhere did you refute me Scripturally.
(DIR) Post #AQwMaVaJ5C8RBtth0y by Eiregoat@nicecrew.digital
2022-12-24T18:32:01.382091Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
I'm not convinced that primogeniture is the best system for selecting rulers. Even if you get one or two good apples out of it it's only a matter of time before you get a dud, then all bets are off. It'll probably end up as a civil war and/or an informal authority ruling the ruler.Tannistry / election by a witane seems like a better option to me. The royal family still has an advantage but not so much of one that they can put a genetic reject on the throne. Whoever lays claim to the throne has to have actual backing and prospects to hold it. Switching up the line of succession once a generation is a good system.
(DIR) Post #AQwMhayxPfhPxTo4sy by famine@fedi.ruinouspowe.rs
2022-12-24T18:44:59.138868Z
9 likes, 0 repeats
my dad used to say God's punishment for polygamy was having more than one wifeyes, he is a boomer
(DIR) Post #AQwMqfPeJGysJ0cKW0 by NotImportant@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:46:41.220121Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@Eiregoat @PvtProperty @RMIV @SerfnUSA The main problem with Irish development is they didn't engage in much low level warfare. The Irish had a history of legalism to settle disputes and we're generally accepting when the Norse came to Ireland seeing as they settled in empty lands and brought trade. It wasn't until the Norman invasion that the Irish would develop militarily with help from Scottish mercenaries. Even the act of Ireland becoming Christian was settled very peacefully with many druids sitting down and discussing it, later to become priests themselves.
(DIR) Post #AQwN3l3kctwNaEcJ7I by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:49:03.121807Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@SerfnUSA @PvtProperty @Eiregoat absolutely. it’s interesting but really not that important for most of us.i do notice that it really polarizes people to point it out and, given that there are so few Whites, i feel it should be pointed out. just rulers & shepherds amongst us, were we ruled by them rather than ZOG, would encourage those who could to take multiple wives.ya’know, be fruitful. multiply. fill the earth. subdue it. that whole thing.
(DIR) Post #AQwNXEiLRwz1xCf1Xc by PvtProperty@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:54:22.859843Z
3 likes, 0 repeats
@branman65 @RMIV @PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA Polygamy is a coomer fantasy, but in actuality it caters to the worst kinds of women and the worst kinds of men. We have serial monogamy right now (polygamy in style) and its made everyone a mental basketcase
(DIR) Post #AQwNgwMWXLE5vr566i by Eiregoat@nicecrew.digital
2022-12-24T18:51:35.513002Z
3 likes, 1 repeats
They did and Irish history is full descriptions of said warfare. The issue is that the stakes were never high so it always remained at a low level. At worst some guys would be killed and you'd lose some cattle, maybe some land, but you could always get it back again. Warfare was mostly structured around a warrior's need to build a reputation rather than any serious existential conflict.Hence why when caesar invaded britain he was encountering warriors rolling up on their chariot, showing off all the heads that were attached to it, and challenging romans to single combat. Then the romans would ignore him, form up, and drive him back as a unit until he rode away in disgust. It was a completely alien conflict for both sides.The Irish vs. the Normans was a similar issue. The normans were used to fighting battles where everything was on the table, so they fought for keeps. The Irish just wanted to do some awesome shit to give their grandkids bragging rights.
(DIR) Post #AQwNgwnSvAmFHPgc6K by NotImportant@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:56:07.916625Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@Eiregoat @PvtProperty @RMIV @SerfnUSA My reading of the Norman invasion was that the Irish were rather disorganized and when it came to internal disputes amongst tribes it was settled in a way to stop greater conflict. Of course that was just the lower classes. Obviously rulers we're quicker to engage in fights over political disagreements, which is why more Irish churches were burned down by Irish rulers then by the Vikings.
(DIR) Post #AQwNtUuRuudaYMwB04 by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:58:24.172230Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@RetardedServantOfChrist @PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA @branman65 because her hypergamy is oriented against you, by various cultural forces such as the narrative, and because she detects no plausible female competition to her when she looks at your life.next time she misbehaves, look her dead in the eye and say with all seriousness, you need a spanking.her reaction to this will reveal how much she respects you. her reaction will be either hostile, derisive, horny, or submissive. if she makes it clear that she would never allow you to put her over your knee and discipline her, she has inadvertently revealed that she does not find you attractive enough to be worthy of such respect. this is a hard litmus, but i have found it to be reliable.if she is not submissive, she is living in contravention of the Word, and whose responsibility is it that she live in accordance with the Word?
(DIR) Post #AQwO0rr30QSRk9rPe4 by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T18:59:44.047698Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@Eiregoat @NotImportant @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA it’s so cool that you guys just know this history.
(DIR) Post #AQwOM0wiOoxs1NawzY by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T19:03:33.352174Z
4 likes, 0 repeats
@PvtProperty @branman65 @PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA to a man who cannot attract the attention of even one woman he desires, of course he would think polygyny is coomer fantasy.in the same way that outta shape fatties conclude that violence is immoral and that gigachad is a shallow knucklehead.in the same way that a flat-chested girl thinks big milkers ain’t shit.
(DIR) Post #AQwOQ84JrLZ1Go77kO by Eiregoat@nicecrew.digital
2022-12-24T19:01:24.129609Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
Gotta open a book sometime bro <3
(DIR) Post #AQwOVt5kSLpWYcWo2S by balan@freespeechextremist.com
2022-12-24T19:05:20.759206Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @RetardedServantOfChrist @PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA @branman65 I doubt my ability to say that with a straight face.
(DIR) Post #AQwOqnNGuNuKuGh6HY by PvtProperty@poa.st
2022-12-24T19:09:07.264285Z
3 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @branman65 @PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA A) Ive dated more than one woman in my life, so if this is a personal thing it doesnt apply to me.B) Polygamy has objectively made it harder for average men to attract women in the first place. Its basic supply and demand. The demand for woman is much higher than the demand for men in a society. Polygamy is basically sexual capitalism, and it has the same deleterious effects. Women know they can do less work to get a man and men know they have to do way more work to get a woman. This does not change with "biblical" rulesets (I believe that concept is contradictory in itself). This is just a basic function of polygamy being allowed
(DIR) Post #AQwOrf9IyWozgaZi0e by Eiregoat@nicecrew.digital
2022-12-24T19:09:14.571988Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
Pretty much. There was no concept of Irish unity until the normans had already taken half the island.
(DIR) Post #AQwOthNVet3DB8Bpdw by Eiregoat@nicecrew.digital
2022-12-24T19:07:36.093942Z
3 likes, 0 repeats
It's not a coomer fantasy in the sense of being unobtainable. I've seen tiny 4' manlets score threesomes, it's totally doable.The coomerism is more about what happens after the first few weeks of fun. All of the poly relationships I've seen have broken apart in jealous screaming. It's not something you could base a society on, let alone a family.
(DIR) Post #AQwP1R16NEKmkdOiMC by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T19:11:02.440862Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@balan @PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA @branman65 @RetardedServantOfChrist then maybe you should man up. you likely know where you are deficient, what things you are doing that are time-wasters or are relatively less-important, and what you should therefore do to grow in your faith, obedience, and authority if you married her as a Christian man.when we stand before God, we cannot say, but i was told by others to do this or to do that, that His Word or virtue was not at the time convenient. this will not suffice.
(DIR) Post #AQwP5NVhLvmz2BaavI by Eiregoat@nicecrew.digital
2022-12-24T19:03:55.236994Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
I do wonder just how common physical correction was in old school marriages. Feminist persecution fantasies aside it's hard to be sure. It must have happened sometimes though since it was explicitly permitted by law.
(DIR) Post #AQwPIJtA835nZCjeqG by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T19:14:05.647360Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Eiregoat @PorkCow @SerfnUSA @branman65 @RetardedServantOfChrist all successful marriages are Old Testament marriage, to this day.this is one of the reasons women are so attracted to violent criminals. so long as she is convinced that you would swat her for getting outta line then you’ll seldom if-ever have to do so.
(DIR) Post #AQwPKtgxz4PFBiGB2u by branman65@poa.st
2022-12-24T19:14:33.667753Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@balan @RMIV @PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA @RetardedServantOfChrist He’s probably going the Andrew Anglin mode of thinking
(DIR) Post #AQwPMkCoE1c8LU2DVQ by balan@freespeechextremist.com
2022-12-24T19:14:53.918135Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @SerfnUSA @PvtProperty @Eiregoat how is race-mixing a violation of the 7th.
(DIR) Post #AQwPUL0Lo0VaVEpPyi by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T19:16:15.946505Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@Eiregoat @PorkCow @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA @branman65 having never grown up in a Christian society, i don’t feel this could be honestly asserted.Christian relationships are centered around Christ. poly relationships that we have witnessed or experienced are centered around hedonism. they could not be more different.
(DIR) Post #AQwQ5dAvD8iLZXYVRQ by balan@freespeechextremist.com
2022-12-24T19:23:00.647774Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@branman65 @RMIV @PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA @RetardedServantOfChrist no, what he says makes sense. but as someone who finds BDSM rather cringe, I'd have a hard time holding it in.
(DIR) Post #AQwQDMBWGSo1C6WFNI by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T19:24:24.073966Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@PvtProperty @branman65 @PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA >Polygamy has objectively made it harder for average men to attract women in the first place. Its basic supply and demand.what you are referring to is "hoe-flation" and it is predicated fundamentally by women enjoyingi) male/female social parity. i've said this over & over in this thread and i'm beginning to think that most of us simply cannot imagine how vastly different daily life would be without it.ii) women's lib/women's rights. without which they would remain in their proper place as property, would not be able to choose their own husbands, and therefore would not waste their fertile years endlessly cruising for a higher alpha on the cock carousel.iii) Biblical rule would fundamentally change everything, including what we detest about women. if the concept is contradictory in itself, whatever that means, i challenge you to show me how. no, it is not a basic function of polygyny being allowed provided the society takes Scripture seriously.
(DIR) Post #AQwQHvTizAWPoWDHXc by balan@freespeechextremist.com
2022-12-24T19:25:13.973317Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@mmmfeet @RMIV @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA no one's forcing you to take a second wife dude.
(DIR) Post #AQwQUNBJoOVXCzXU24 by balan@freespeechextremist.com
2022-12-24T19:27:28.941356Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@MiketheLeaf @RMIV @SerfnUSA I'm getting zero pussy in the society we have now.
(DIR) Post #AQwQXkBYjxstQGG7vM by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T19:28:05.162623Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@balan @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA
(DIR) Post #AQwQZuutoRlxHgVECO by Eiregoat@nicecrew.digital
2022-12-24T19:21:49.861717Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
Are we talking at cross purposes here?I'm claiming that poly relationships (at least the ones I've seen) have been hedonistic and therefore a poor structural unit for society. They're all reward with no productivity, like a more dedicated version of fapping to porn.
(DIR) Post #AQwQh8l8kE9yF9NlBY by TimothyMcFuck@shitpost.cloud
2022-12-24T17:23:05.735241Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
Reddit is a shit hole
(DIR) Post #AQwQjJYNaDAQIfRyXQ by TimothyMcFuck@shitpost.cloud
2022-12-24T17:23:42.262675Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
(DIR) Post #AQwQlMti7YgvFbPIv2 by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T19:30:32.930317Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Eiregoat @PorkCow @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA @branman65 that’s like saying every business with more than one employee would be unproductive.as if there could be a successful marriage that is all reward with no productivity, as you say. it’s silly.
(DIR) Post #AQwQnoQCl3PBC6lt20 by PvtProperty@poa.st
2022-12-24T19:30:59.464329Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @branman65 @PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA It would not change the fundamental problem of supply and demand. Polygamous societies do not provide enough women for the men who want to marry. This cannot be denied. This problem has showed up in literally every society that has practiced polygamy. Its also part of why hordes of Muslim men had to die in wars of conquest in order for their social orders to survive. No rule set can fix the problem of men being spiteful/unmotivated because they are alone with no wives.
(DIR) Post #AQwREVHw0HA5fid9Pc by Eiregoat@nicecrew.digital
2022-12-24T19:34:30.807507Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
Families require much much closer bonds than businesses to be successful though. They're built as much on trust as contract. I don't think the two can be compared.> as if there could be a successful marriage that is all reward with no productivity, as you say. it’s silly.Yes. But that's my point: The decision to take more than one wife is an inherently hedonistic one under almost all circumstances. One wife can produce more children than most societies can support, so there's no good reason for a second one other than "it's fun."
(DIR) Post #AQwRLbZX2Sg7BiFPvc by branman65@poa.st
2022-12-24T19:37:05.930603Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@PvtProperty @RMIV @PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA Polygamous societies literally have to be constantly in war in order to prevent beta uprising
(DIR) Post #AQwRNTerQxrlDpdJL6 by PvtProperty@poa.st
2022-12-24T19:37:26.241791Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Eiregoat @RMIV @PorkCow @SerfnUSA @branman65 For every extra wife in the group thats another marriage that just disappeared from possibility. A man that couldve produced children and added to society has now been demoted to permanent peasant status with no hope of escape
(DIR) Post #AQwRNYnCLOVR98ZXWq by balan@freespeechextremist.com
2022-12-24T19:37:27.361702Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @PvtProperty @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA >where there is no law, there is no transgressionthe bible leaves a lot of grey areas though, topics about which scripture has little, if anything, to say directly. Points go to Islam in this regard. They are increbily exhuastive about what is and is not allowed.
(DIR) Post #AQwRipGAJYoGIeGHfE by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T19:41:17.650439Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@PvtProperty @branman65 @PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA This cannot be denied.oh it sure can. watch me. your supposition assumes that everyone gets married. now that i’ve said that, we can each think of many instances where this is not the case and none of them have to do with polygyny. so already there’s more women to go around.then there’s the fact that polygynous marriages would be comparatively rare for a variety of reasons, whether most men wouldn’t want the burden (the Apostles famously replied to Christ that if marriage was as serious as he said then it is better not to marry) or could or would want to afford it. probably the reason most men would even have more than one wife is because their brother died and Scripture called him to take her to wife.Its also part of why hordes of Muslim men had to diey’all keep bringing this up but they are not Christian and i otherwise do not consider sandniggers germane to this conversation.No rule set other than monogamy can fix the problembullshit. you also are not even attempting to refute me Scripturally.
(DIR) Post #AQwRkx54CuMd8S5Hgu by PvtProperty@poa.st
2022-12-24T19:41:40.771957Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@branman65 @RMIV @PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA If your culture tells you that your two options are either stay single until you die or go and kill your neighbor and rape his wife, your culture sucks
(DIR) Post #AQwRpAYs1oHm6T2Gsi by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T19:42:26.440305Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@balan @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA Scripture is perfectly clear.Romans 4:15 and Romans 5:13 are clear- if God did not prohibit something in His Law, it isn’t Sin. That isn’t to say it isn’t sin for a particular person (“whatever is not from faith is sin” and “to one who knows the right thing to do and does not do it, to him it is sin”), but those are personal issues between the individual and the Holy Spirit and the brother is NOT to be judged over such issues (Romans 14:4).
(DIR) Post #AQwS4LyxqdHfrtTthI by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T19:45:10.735435Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Eiregoat @PorkCow @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA @branman65 The decision to take more than one wife is an inherently hedonistic one under almost all circumstances.if that’s what you think then we won’t waste time discussing it. my position is Scriptural; yours is not.
(DIR) Post #AQwS65M2dmJysS6L1U by PvtProperty@poa.st
2022-12-24T19:45:29.983074Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @branman65 @PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA Im not attempting to refute you scripturally. I dont have to. I am perfectly fine with relying on the last 2000 years of Christian monogamy. Mechanically speaking polygyny is a terrible idea, regardless of whatever religious rule set you're following. It doesnt work unless all the men in your culture are dying constantly. Supply and demand.
(DIR) Post #AQwSClEDrq3gU5cwJU by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T19:46:42.248208Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@PvtProperty @branman65 @PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA Im not attempting to refute you scripturally.then we won’t waste time discussing it. my position is Scriptural; yours is not.
(DIR) Post #AQwSWpqWPNrCb775ii by HitlerIs6_4@nicecrew.digital
2022-12-24T19:41:06.384513Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
The only time I think it can be justified is if a large portion of the male population dies off in some way but the female population stays alive.
(DIR) Post #AQwU3glvGbZ7xtBxXU by balan@freespeechextremist.com
2022-12-24T20:07:28.781862Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA so then lesbians must be cool with god, right? there's nothing in the bible that specifically prohibits it. Paul implies that's it's a sinful behaviour, but nowhere in the OT is it actually explicitly prohibited.
(DIR) Post #AQwUTSN1Qz9QpPpdaK by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T20:12:07.898456Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@balan @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA wives who fuck each other with their husband, as part of a “staff meeting” in bed, could not reasonably be called lesbians.women are property of Husbands and Fathers and will never be outside of male authority in a Biblical frame.
(DIR) Post #AQwUVl0d6fCvDNSH2G by Eiregoat@nicecrew.digital
2022-12-24T19:49:39.345074Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
My position is scriptural, the scripture in question just isn't jewish.Best of luck, I'd suggest trying to make monogamy work before you try anything more advanced though.
(DIR) Post #AQwUiH5Pfc7SAvf3E8 by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T20:14:48.564329Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Eiregoat @PorkCow @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA @branman65 >My position is scriptural, the scripture in question just isn't jewish."everything i don't like gets branded jewish."
(DIR) Post #AQwUmtTkrxWiPFFWsK by Dadbolgainz@poa.st
2022-12-24T20:15:38.482128Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @Eiregoat @PorkCow @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA @branman65 Just get along and enjoy Christmas.
(DIR) Post #AQwUwcgi9XBNE2wtHs by Eiregoat@nicecrew.digital
2022-12-24T20:16:06.083956Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
But... it is literally jewish 🤣
(DIR) Post #AQwUwdNba3UfN51996 by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T20:17:23.970219Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Eiregoat @PorkCow @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA @branman65 okay.
(DIR) Post #AQwV6iNtpO5pmyxhsO by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T20:19:13.573682Z
5 likes, 3 repeats
@Dadbolgainz @Eiregoat @PorkCow @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA @branman65 i am enjoying Christmas.
(DIR) Post #AQwVDWseztRa8abEPY by Dadbolgainz@poa.st
2022-12-24T20:20:27.608413Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @Eiregoat @PorkCow @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA @branman65 Awesome. Marry Christmas brother.
(DIR) Post #AQwVIStHG9l1D7F2rA by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T20:21:21.000077Z
6 likes, 1 repeats
@Dadbolgainz @Eiregoat @PorkCow @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA @branman65 Merry Christmas bro.
(DIR) Post #AQwWuXb4JH5ulVRcRc by PorkCow@freespeechextremist.com
2022-12-24T20:39:26.503305Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @branman65 @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA We don't have multiple generations to break the conditioning. Assuming for the sake of argument holocaust the zequel goes in our favor, we would have a moral majority society for 4 years before a nuke goes off. I won't spend it killing our own ranks for the right of husbandry.
(DIR) Post #AQwXKH5iIgKR6R379U by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T20:44:05.082353Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA @branman65 >killing our own ranks for the right of husbandry.i'm not sure what you mean by this.
(DIR) Post #AQwY5qrB8tXZdcwA3k by PorkCow@freespeechextremist.com
2022-12-24T20:52:41.439807Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA @branman65 Supply and demand. Polygamy is mathematically retarded, and any remotely suitable male would be forced to kill more socially acceptable normies who picked team gentile out of cowardice (no more brother wars), replace courtship with a radiator (gross), or just opt out (this option retroactively makes the realocaust a total waste of time)
(DIR) Post #AQwYYO5XBL8GoQG6XA by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-24T20:57:50.304828Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@PorkCow @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA @branman65 >Polygamy is mathematically retardedi think you're mathematically retarded.
(DIR) Post #AQwZhduHq1EYQuyVNI by FlamingHart@nicecrew.digital
2022-12-24T20:37:46.912241Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
This is all very interesting. I think also worth mentioning: multiple wives is more beneficial in societies where men faced extreme hazard on a regular basis. (i.e. Scandinavian countries that raided regularly)
(DIR) Post #AQwaSFdtrzJUmzXE48 by MiketheLeaf@poa.st
2022-12-24T21:19:08.761742Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@balan @RMIV @SerfnUSA which is a non legalized polygamous society. The only change would be the Chad's would have wives and not side hoes.In a post social media tinder society, women would not over value ate their puss
(DIR) Post #AQwpuX91tDNYUY2Vg8 by balan@freespeechextremist.com
2022-12-25T00:12:19.547951Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA I agree to both points, although I would assert wives married to the same man are not married to each other and therefore, any sexual relations between sister-wives would technically by adultery.
(DIR) Post #AQwqtX4skjG9wtBbHs by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-25T00:23:21.170730Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@balan @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA okay, man.
(DIR) Post #AQzKmTIRnZdf8T04US by Turdicus@poa.st
2022-12-26T05:07:39.028059Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@SerfnUSA biggus thinkus.
(DIR) Post #AQzLYOVyscmSCnBKYy by balan@freespeechextremist.com
2022-12-26T05:16:19.077717Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA adultery just means sexual relations with someone to whom you are not married.
(DIR) Post #AQzMW4FFN7s0iLoDAW by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-26T05:27:05.794759Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@balan @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA not according to Scripture. the crime of adultery requires a married woman. no married woman, no adultery. women really, really hate this because a married man is permitted to have sex with women other than his wife. while the women are committing adultery if they do it.
(DIR) Post #AQzNK41cSmw2VnH6Jc by balan@freespeechextremist.com
2022-12-26T05:36:08.287856Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA so how do you explain Matt. 5:27-28?
(DIR) Post #AQzO8ErESk80aTLEXY by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-26T05:45:11.544363Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@balan @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA Christians don’t know the definitions of words the Bible uses. This is combined with their unconscious internalization of cultural norms which effects the way they perceive what the Bible says. Usually in error. So, let’s take a look at words. Keep in mind, when it comes to Christianity the Law forms the skeleton and grace fleshes it out. Lust. There isn’t anything really on point as to what lust is, but we can logically deduce what lust isn’t by looking at God’s various prohibitions. Lust is contextually defined as a sin and is closely related to coveting, but a good basic definition of lust is it’s a desire that cannot be legitimately fulfilled. The problem with this word is it falls afoul of the Biblical double standard between men and women. The cultural norms say we’re “equal” but this just isn’t so in the way that most Americans want to define equality. Yes, we’re equal in value but not in status because of the authority structure that God ordained for everyone.Can a man or woman lust after their spouse? No. The question is ridiculous, because a desire for one’s spouse is natural, normal and healthy. Then come the ankle-biters who want to reframe the issue saying “but what about an unhealthy fixation or infatuation with the spouse? Isn’t it a problem when a person is so focused on their desire for their spouse that they ignore God?” See how they do that? Gosh, if I said it was natural, normal and healthy to have an appetite they’d start talking about overeating and gluttony. The reason I bring up the word lust is it’s one of those difficult words that’s often twisted to become a club used to beat men with. The passage in Matthew 5:27-32 where Jesus said if a man looks on a woman with lust in his heart he’s already committed adultery in his heart is a beautiful case in point that demonstrates how an improper understanding of Scripture results in bad doctrine. First, the only way to look at a woman with lust in the heart is if she cannot legitimately be obtained and the only way that happens is if she’s married. It doesn’t matter if the man is married or not because a man can legitimately have more than one wife, but the only woman a man can legitimately marry without committing adultery is one who is eligible to marry.A young man who looks on an unmarried woman with desire in his heart is not lusting after her because his desire for her can legitimately be fulfilled. That desire is the driving force behind the desire to marry and only an idiot would truly think men decide to marry women they aren’t attracted to. It may happen from time to time for various reasons, but in general it simply doesn’t happen. Why? Because that’s the way God made men.Understanding how much trouble the word lust can cause, let’s try the word “Adultery.” According to the Liddell Scott lexicon, the word “adultery” is best translated as “to mongrelize” and there’s both a physical and spiritual component to the word. Idolatry is spiritual adultery and adultery is physical idolatry. The problem with adultery in the physical sense is it’s a sex-specific crime (sin) which requires a married woman. No married woman, no adultery. Women don’t like this because they want adultery to apply to men who have sex with a woman they aren’t married to, but it doesn’t work that way according to Exodus 22:16-17 and Deuteronomy 22:28-29. If a man (with no distinction between married or unmarried) seduces a virgin he is to pay the father the bride price and marry her. Because he has “humbled” her he cannot divorce her all the days of his life. If the father refuses to allow the marriage the man is to pay a price equal to the bride price. That’s it. No prohibition, no condemnation.The only thing necessary for a marriage to occur with an eligible virgin is sex. With the act of penetration the man is making his commitment to marry her and neither her commitment or consent is required. It is good to get the approval of the father first, because if she is still living at home her father can annul the marriage later if he doesn’t approve. With a woman who is not a virgin but eligible to marry, her consent to marry is required in addition to sex (Numbers 30:9; 1st Corinthians 7:39).In Genesis 2:24 there is no prescribed ceremony required to initiate marriage and the authority rests solely with the man. With that in mind, let’s look at the situation with the seduction of a virgin not betrothed in Exodus 22:16-17 and Deuteronomy 22:28-29. (Under the Law a betrothed virgin was considered to be legally married, not a single woman).
(DIR) Post #AQzOJfb7NrVuhoFsMC by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-26T05:47:15.871244Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@balan @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA We see no prohibition on a man seducing a not-betrothed virgin, nor a condemnation. Back to the elements of marriage, with the consummation of the marriage already accomplished, the man is required to pay the father what he is owed (the bride price) and publicly live with the woman as husband and wife. It isn’t punishment we are looking at but the requirement to meet his responsibilities with the additional restriction that because he didn’t follow proper procedure and get the father’s permission first, he cannot divorce her all the days of his life (he has “humbled” her). There is no distinction between whether the man was married or unmarried, because a man can legitimately have more than one wife. This is difficult for women because women are treated differently in this situation. If a virgin living in her fathers house (not betrothed) has sex with a man and later gets married as if she was a virgin, it’s a death-penalty offense if she’s caught but there’s no corresponding penalty for the guy she gave her virginity to because he didn’t commit adultery. She’s defrauding her husband (having cuckolded him before she married him) and having fraudulently married him she’s now guilty of adultery, which is a death-penalty offense.The point is the Law makes a clear distinction between sex outside of marriage with an unmarried (and not betrothed) woman and sex with another man’s wife or fianceé. There is no specific prohibition or condemnation of the first, but the second is a death penalty offense. Again, the crime of adultery requires the participation of a married (or betrothed) woman. With that in mind, let’s look at the word “fornication” and I can already hear the screams of outrage. What is the definition of fornication? The problem is there is no passage in Scripture that defines what fornication is, specifically, so we have to work with context and identify what fornication isn’t to help us understand what it is.Since fornication is obviously a sin, the previously mentioned example of a man having sex with an unmarried woman outside the bounds of marriage cannot apply because that activity has no prohibition or condemnation. Please note, I didn’t say that the pre-marital sex was not a sin, I pointed out that it wasn’t fornication. However, we must juxtapose the word fornication with adultery because the two are related. Given that the word adultery is literally translated as “mongrelize” it carries with it the idea of penis-in-vagina sexual intercourse that could result in a bastard child being born. But what about other actions that don’t reach the point of sexual intercourse, such as a blowjob, heavy kissing petting and that sort of thing? Could it be that fornication is sexual (and possibly even emotional) infidelity on the part of a married woman that doesn’t reach the level of fornication?Fornication and Adultery are related because in Hebrews 13:4 we see the command “Marriage is to be held in honor among all, and the marriage bed is to be undefiled; for fornicators and adulterers God will judge.” Fornication and adultery are in the same class of sexual sin that defiles the marital bed. We see in Matthew 19:9 and Matthew 5:31-32 that Jesus interpreted the Law concerning divorce as only being permitted for the sexual immorality of the wife. The term He used in both those passages was “porneia” which is quite often translated as “fornication” or “sexual immorality.” Notice that in both cases the word was specifically applied to the married women.Adultery is a married woman having sex with a man she is not married to and both the man and married woman are guilty of the crime. Given the contextual placement, fornication appears to be a more inclusive term which would encompass even the non-physical aspects of a married woman giving her affections to a man she’s not married to (the “emotional affair”). It also includes any sexual contact that doesn’t cross the bar to be classified as adultery. Let’s see how that works with Matthew 5:27-32: “You have heard that it was said, ‘YOU SHALL NOT COMMIT ADULTERY’; but I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart. If your right eye makes you stumble, tear it out and throw it from you; for it is better for you to lose one of the parts of your body, than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. If your right hand makes you stumble, cut it off and throw it from you; for it is better for you to lose one of the parts of your body, than for your whole body to go into hell. It was said, ‘WHOEVER SENDS HIS WIFE AWAY, LET HIM GIVE HER A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE’; but I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except for the reason of unchastity, makes her commit adultery; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.”
(DIR) Post #AQzOSbxyFqyG37CwtM by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-26T05:48:52.858231Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@balan @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA The only way a man can look on a woman with lust is if she’s already married or betrothed to be married, because again, the crime of adultery requires a married woman and the man who looks at the woman with lust has already committed adultery in his heart. A man cannot commit adultery with an unmarried woman. The eye that causes the man to sin is the eye that looks on the married woman with lust, the hand that causes the man to sin is the hand that touches her. The married woman who dresses immodestly out of a desire to stimulate the sexual interest of men is fornicating, it’s sexual immorality. The married woman who allows herself to be touched in a sexual manner by other men is fornicating and it is only for this reason, the sexual immorality or fornication, that Jesus said divorce was allowed.I suggest the word “fornication” doesn’t mean what most people assume it means and as numerous posts on this blog have pointed out, there is a double standard in the Bible when it comes to men and women’s standards of behavior. Romans 4:15 and Romans 5:13 are very clear: where there is no law there is no transgression and no sin is imputed. No Law = No Sin. It gets a bit more complicated when you take Romans 14 (that which is not of faith is sin) and James 4:17 (not doing the thing you know to be right is sin) into account, but this is dependent on the individual.(Pre-marital sex may not be listed as a sin in the Law, but given the instruction of Romans 14 and James 4 I think it’s something a Christian would have a difficult time justifying in their heart as being of faith and the right thing to do. However, the classification in the Law impacts how we define words like fornication.) So, with no Law prohibiting or condemning the extra-marital sex of the man and woman in Exodus 22:16-17 and Deuteronomy 22:28-29, we cannot call it a sin unless marriage is to be referred to as a punishment. This cannot be because God created marriage and called it good, therefore it is not fornication. It does not matter if the man is married (he’s authorized to take another wife) or single. In fact, the married man in such a situation cannot be committing adultery because the woman (not his wife) he was having sex with was single and not betrothed. To claim this behavior is contrary to the Law (sinful) is to violate Deuteronomy 4:2, the crime of adding to the Law.Notice also that the Law was silent on a man having sex with a prostitute, and silent on a woman working as a prostitute. I’m not arguing that it’s right and good, but God didn’t declare it to be a sin. Why did Paul take pains to instruct the believers in 1st Corinthians 6 not to have sex with prostitutes if it was considered fornication (it wasn’t) and a sin (it wasn’t). Consider also that Paul said of joining the members of Christ with a whore “may it never be!” Even though the Law was silent on this, it is immorality for a Christian to do so. Just as Christians are forbidden to divorce their Christian wife, this is a restriction that applies to the Bondservants of Christ- not a change to the Law.Again, I’m not claiming that Christians get a free pass on extra-marital sex because the Law doesn’t condemn it. However, it is impossible to understand what adultery and fornication are without examining the issue of sex outside the marriage and having pointed out that the Law contains no prohibitions or condemnation of pre-marital sex between persons eligible to marry, I have to also point out that Romans 14 says we are not to judge in such matters. In the case of the married man who keeps a mistress on the side, is she a mistress or his concubine? I’d say concubine and I can’t see that it’s a sin according to what the Bible says. What I cannot approve of is the modern cultural response that in such cases the husband and wife should get divorced so he can marry his mistress. In such a case neither the wife nor the husband have legitimate grounds for divorce and I must say that I believe destroying a family with an illegitimate divorce is a sin no matter who does it. Anyone who wishes may feel free to argue the point, but make it an argument from Scripture rather than from emotion.Since I already know I’ll have rocks thrown at me I may as well seal the deal: Everything I’ve discussed in the last few posts has highlighted the double-standard between men and woman in the Bible, which is God’s ordained structure of authority. There are numerous restrictions on the behavior of women that are not placed on men, but before getting upset about that one must understand that God made both men and women and He understands exactly what women are really like. It is obvious to me that God placed the restrictions on women’s behavior that He did because women needed to be restrained.
(DIR) Post #AQzOT2NO3ykZxTIc7M by balan@freespeechextremist.com
2022-12-26T05:48:57.891679Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA >Can a man or woman lust after their spouse? No.Augustine is raging from the grave.
(DIR) Post #AQzOYDlb8nqijW5yvA by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-26T05:49:53.749054Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@balan @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA I’ve been going over the definitions of key words in this post and it should emphasize the truth of the goal of the feminine imperative: to maximally restrict men’s sexual options while giving maximum freedom to women. Folks, this started in the church. Look at how marriage was redefined from the patriarchal multiple wives allowed model to the feminist requirement of monogamy. Look at how the words lust, adultery and fornication have been expanded and changed to apply to men in ways they were never meant to. Look at how women, who were never given the authority to divorce their husbands (except for 1st Cor. 7:15 and in the case of polygynous marriages Exodus 21:10), have created such a “right” out of thin air and use it frequently.At the end of the day men have a great deal of freedom in how they may act, but with that freedom comes responsibility.
(DIR) Post #AQzOZwfFhLLoGowvNw by balan@freespeechextremist.com
2022-12-26T05:50:12.797599Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA jesus christ, I really asked for a sermon didn't I
(DIR) Post #AQzOfE6WHiSZo5Domm by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-26T05:51:09.217971Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@balan @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA Augustine was a sex-hating beta male.
(DIR) Post #AQzOlRM5vig8dsTC0u by balan@freespeechextremist.com
2022-12-26T05:52:17.432038Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA only in his later years. from what I understand, he was quite the womanizer in his youth.
(DIR) Post #AQzOvuXCIWBU2FeivI by SuperSnekFriend@poa.st
2022-12-26T05:54:10.547589Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@PvtProperty @RMIV @Eiregoat @SerfnUSA There is only one Father and one Spirit. One Christ and One Church. Their images and likeness, us humans, don't need more than a 1 male:1 female split. Anything different is dysfunction.
(DIR) Post #AQzOxzZ6Z3MMDWXZJ2 by RMIV@poa.st
2022-12-26T05:54:33.243701Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@balan @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA well, i know where you’re coming from in asking about this. the lies we’ve been told regarding the Christian faith are voluminous.so if you want to know the answer then nothing short of that which is comprehensive and Scripturally exegetical will suffice.
(DIR) Post #AR5gGDvOmLDe8O0Upk by balan@freespeechextremist.com
2022-12-29T06:36:36.439773Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@RMIV @Eiregoat @PvtProperty @SerfnUSA I appreciate your throroughness