Post ANx86flHTN3gHo4GrA by InsRe@poa.st
(DIR) More posts by InsRe@poa.st
(DIR) Post #ANx4InKikQUJQZAZ8a by ThotsAndOpinions@poa.st
2022-09-26T09:17:16.378154Z
3 likes, 1 repeats
since there's no forum of autists meticulously analyzing documents and stories right now...what is the current popular take? Real or nah?
(DIR) Post #ANx4jOIbvpbhbXrfHs by TerminallyOnline@poa.st
2022-09-26T09:20:03.525471Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions honestly it probably real England is a woke shithole now
(DIR) Post #ANx4jOqHucXtHzcYmO by ThotsAndOpinions@poa.st
2022-09-26T09:22:05.075586Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@TerminallyOnline If it's real, then it means the hackers actually got the users' info from kiwi farms and went further to report the users to their respective authorities. That's a lot.
(DIR) Post #ANx4sfwBipv6unntJ2 by Charlamagne@poa.st
2022-09-26T09:23:45.709245Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions Most likely a Vordrak gayop
(DIR) Post #ANx4veCsc6bMPr1orw by ThotsAndOpinions@poa.st
2022-09-26T09:24:18.087258Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Charlamagne oh! any reason you believe that?
(DIR) Post #ANx57IjoGBwTJ3zJR2 by Charlamagne@poa.st
2022-09-26T09:26:24.329632Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions If I'm not mistaken he printed out a similar document around 2018. More info on the guy reddit.com/r/Drama/comments/4wpu6o/vordrak_vs_kiwi_farms/
(DIR) Post #ANx5Hemr8XqOaQLoJc by ScampussAurelius@poa.st
2022-09-26T09:24:44.740529Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions youtu.be/gwp61n5zeYosimpler times when these frivolous matters were handled accordingly
(DIR) Post #ANx5Iib6SHeuh5MM9w by Awoo@bae.st
2022-09-26T09:28:28.272187Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions When I look up PACE Interview it mostly turns up stuff about Business Regulators.
(DIR) Post #ANx5UkMLjJ7LdMC6jY by Awoo@bae.st
2022-09-26T09:30:38.657684Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions Just seems like a strange practice to me to send a letter."Oi we know you have been playing silly buggers online. Please come down to the station to confess to these crimes."
(DIR) Post #ANx5bWeH6Z0r8ZoLz6 by 911yay@poa.st
2022-09-26T09:30:36.685880Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions best i found was this 🤷 but this image originated from that matthew hopkins blog so who knows. it could just be someone who printed out a letter
(DIR) Post #ANx5fWjUjYXsYaA1YG by Cyn7kaL@poa.st
2022-09-26T09:26:48.919411Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions >Communications Act 2003Has to be real, because there have been so many ridiculous cases of people being prosecuted under that act. It was that act that got Count Dankula arrested for the Nazi pug video. Not to mention last year some woman got arrested for posting something "transphobic" under CA 2003.
(DIR) Post #ANx5m1S3R33BZC6Hom by Awoo@bae.st
2022-09-26T09:33:45.964711Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions Also as someone pointed out in an earlier thread the phone number listed is wrong. https://www.bizseek.co.uk/west-yorkshire-police-brighouse-police-01484-405251If it is fake that is a pretty rookie mistake to make.
(DIR) Post #ANx5pPAFjBaZynO2E4 by Awoo@bae.st
2022-09-26T09:34:22.728183Z
3 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions https://fakenumber.org/phone/0141-496-0373
(DIR) Post #ANx5uYPskwdS7e9WNM by TerminallyOnline@poa.st
2022-09-26T09:28:29.093738Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions a lot and the hacker went and gave illegally obtained info to the police which is super retarded as well but im sure the police ignored the hacking = illegal part for the easy arrests of people sayin mean words. But knowing some the shady shit and retarded ass laws we have here i genuinely think it is real. lucas and his army of mentally fucked teenage boys and some other pedo lefties probably are still probably tryna find someway to affirm themselves that they are the 'good guys' and i mean at least they got the guys part down
(DIR) Post #ANx6IGHXpbPkpTYcT2 by ThotsAndOpinions@poa.st
2022-09-26T09:39:35.244725Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@Awoo woooow, you just did more research than the entire kino casino "news team". hahaha
(DIR) Post #ANx6J5bqzqxm1ES3hg by Awoo@bae.st
2022-09-26T09:39:44.570619Z
2 likes, 1 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions Also a quick google search shows that they normally have an email address listed as well. Yeah, I can safely say this is 100% fake. Based of using an actual "fake" number it is probably form a mock template.
(DIR) Post #ANx6Q4CIe4nrfMpGUK by DeDi@poa.st
2022-09-26T09:41:00.156408Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions The letter looks authentic, and making fake police letters would be a very stupid thing to do. In any case I will share the text from probably the most relevant law cited in this letter, Section 4 and 4A from the Protection from Harassment Act 1997:4Putting people in fear of violence.(1)A person whose course of conduct causes another to fear, on at least two occasions, that violence will be used against him is guilty of an offence if he knows or ought to know that his course of conduct will cause the other so to fear on each of those occasions.(2)For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it will cause another to fear that violence will be used against him on any occasion if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct would cause the other so to fear on that occasion.(3)It is a defence for a person charged with an offence under this section to show that—(a)his course of conduct was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime,(b)his course of conduct was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment, or(c)the pursuit of his course of conduct was reasonable for the protection of himself or another or for the protection of his or another’s property.(4)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—(a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding [F1ten years], or a fine, or both, or(b)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, or both.(5)If on the trial on indictment of a person charged with an offence under this section the jury find him not guilty of the offence charged, they may find him guilty of an offence under section 2 [F2or 2A].(6)The Crown Court has the same powers and duties in relation to a person who is by virtue of subsection (5) convicted before it of an offence under section 2 [F3or 2A] as a magistrates’ court would have on convicting him of the offence.4AStalking involving fear of violence or serious alarm or distress(1)A person (“A”) whose course of conduct—(a)amounts to stalking, and(b)either—(i)causes another (“B”) to fear, on at least two occasions, that violence will be used against B, or(ii)causes B serious alarm or distress which has a substantial adverse effect on B's usual day-to-day activities,is guilty of an offence if A knows or ought to know that A's course of conduct will cause B so to fear on each of those occasions or (as the case may be) will cause such alarm or distress.(2)For the purposes of this section A ought to know that A's course of conduct will cause B to fear that violence will be used against B on any occasion if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct would cause B so to fear on that occasion.(3)For the purposes of this section A ought to know that A's course of conduct will cause B serious alarm or distress which has a substantial adverse effect on B's usual day-to-day activities if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct would cause B such alarm or distress.(4)It is a defence for A to show that—(a)A's course of conduct was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime,(b)A's course of conduct was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment, or(c)the pursuit of A's course of conduct was reasonable for the protection of A or another or for the protection of A's or another's property.(5)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—(a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding [F2ten years], or a fine, or both, or(b)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding twelve months, or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, or both.(6)In relation to an offence committed before [F32 May 2022], the reference in subsection (5)(b) to twelve months is to be read as a reference to six months.(7)If on the trial on indictment of a person charged with an offence under this section the jury find the person not guilty of the offence charged, they may find the person guilty of an offence under section 2 or 2A.(8)The Crown Court has the same powers and duties in relation to a person who is by virtue of subsection (7) convicted before it of an offence under section 2 or 2A as a magistrates' court would have on convicting the person of the offence.(9)This section is without prejudice to the generality of section 4.]So if this letter is legit, then our boy must have been targeting a specific person with some sort of violence/stalking that the police are taking seriously. If it's based on lies, he will be fine.
(DIR) Post #ANx6RededwukyaNUjQ by Awoo@bae.st
2022-09-26T09:41:17.464762Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions Amazing what a person can uncover with a few minutes and a few google searches >.> People are too quick to believe what they want without even taking the time to google shit.
(DIR) Post #ANx6XysmI1vnV0T6jA by ThotsAndOpinions@poa.st
2022-09-26T09:42:26.148112Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@Awoo for me, the chain of events that would lead up to this letter being real seems highly unlikely; thank you for looking things up!
(DIR) Post #ANx6kmDQhEdZyhEIVs by Awoo@bae.st
2022-09-26T09:44:44.811506Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions :blobcatthumbsup:
(DIR) Post #ANx7R3dcJJwAAudiiW by InsRe@poa.st
2022-09-26T09:52:03.055950Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions FWIW there was a thread yesterday where this was discussed, and someone pointed out that the letter/picture was first posted on one of (seemingly) Vordrak's websites (the name is apparently one of the pseudonyms he uses often or something).
(DIR) Post #ANx7WYfAO6nDqSzGyW by ThotsAndOpinions@poa.st
2022-09-26T09:53:22.990024Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@InsRe omg, why would he make it that obvious! Isn't impersonating a letter like this illegal too?? lol
(DIR) Post #ANx7yUkiWKMBpEuA5Y by Awoo@bae.st
2022-09-26T09:58:25.852722Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions Also a quick side note on this 0141 496 037X are all Fake numbers that come up on that same site. So there goes any claim that the last digit isn't 3. Because all of them are fake.
(DIR) Post #ANx85jsifYXum56OOm by InsRe@poa.st
2022-09-26T09:56:41.772170Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions I would imagine it is, but it seems logic goes out the window for these people when dealing with KF.
(DIR) Post #ANx85kFPJCh5uRiVlI by ThotsAndOpinions@poa.st
2022-09-26T09:59:44.357118Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@InsRe well the DDos and hack itself is also seriously illegal, so idk why anyone would take credit for it, but then again all this loser e-celebs are so hungry for clout and Ws, they'll straight up confess it to court if they thought it would make someone post "based" in chat.
(DIR) Post #ANx86flHTN3gHo4GrA by InsRe@poa.st
2022-09-26T09:59:10.316871Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions Plus, they usually get away with everything they do so that is probably part of it.
(DIR) Post #ANx8BQwTzwIplyZsm0 by graf@poa.st
2022-09-26T10:00:44.506706Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions @InsRe I hate the internet so much
(DIR) Post #ANx8HYs1R0WY6BPgZs by ThotsAndOpinions@poa.st
2022-09-26T10:01:52.592625Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@Awoo well, well, well, looks like the ops stay gay
(DIR) Post #ANx8SJBC73aMcVVOvQ by ThotsAndOpinions@poa.st
2022-09-26T10:03:49.231090Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@graf @InsRe I like this part of it. I think it'll be okay, friend.
(DIR) Post #ANx9r0X0gPlbyg3DfM by 1967GTO@poa.st
2022-09-26T10:19:29.212959Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@Awoo @ThotsAndOpinions Even if it was real (it isn't) it's filled with BS.>You are required to ...>Please contact me ... within seven days>within 14 days of the receipt of ...>will result in you being reported ...A letter making demands with arbitrary and unenforceable deadlines, under threat of [checking notes] being reported? LOL.
(DIR) Post #ANx9xXaYgqFWExpGvQ by Awoo@bae.st
2022-09-26T10:20:40.157256Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@1967GTO Yeah as I pointed out before. What sort of Police force sends you are letter basically telling you to come down to the station to confess. @ThotsAndOpinions
(DIR) Post #ANxHQrlnR1j0uO0rbs by RhoasJonas@poa.st
2022-09-26T10:10:22.643419Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions @Charlamagne There's no such body as the "Public Prosecution Service" in England, its the "Crown Prosecution Service".
(DIR) Post #ANxWAyQoOlEUFR4rrc by jeffcliff@shitposter.club
2022-09-26T14:29:36.461645Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@ThotsAndOpinions @TerminallyOnline No. It means that any TCP/IP activity is logged and viewed by the police and you should be using tor
(DIR) Post #ANxWJDsopiGMUH6wxk by NearKF@chudbuds.lol
2022-09-26T11:55:26.160820Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
Well you see it's the West Yorkshire department in Glasgow. So I don't blame you for having trouble verifying the authenticity. It's a very historical city lmfao