Post ANg4PjefWENoMLUUC0 by icscarythings@froth.zone
(DIR) More posts by icscarythings@froth.zone
(DIR) Post #ANfzRbgDdoMQQxHyJE by bajax@bajax.us
2022-09-18T03:32:45.205905Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
should I get starlink and put it on an RV?
(DIR) Post #ANg0h6yRfmzFmvlsJs by icscarythings@froth.zone
2022-09-18T03:45:18.697735Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@bajax idk how well it handles actually moving around when in use yet. I think they said there are still issues with it.I actually have the RV version because they wouldn't let me get the normal one in my area due to coverage issues, but I still get about 30-40Mbps avg though I have seen it surge to 100 once just not often. During a bad storm it got pretty bad once and dropped to about 7, but thats to be expected for satellite. Overall still way better than the LTE and other internet coverage out here which caps at like 25 and has hard data usage caps that make streaming or downloading anything impossible.
(DIR) Post #ANg25bTi0i09IddYTw by bajax@bajax.us
2022-09-18T04:02:23.154775Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@icscarythings how's latency?
(DIR) Post #ANg4PjefWENoMLUUC0 by icscarythings@froth.zone
2022-09-18T04:22:08.919991Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@bajax I think it varies a lot. I'll have to check again at a better time because right now its night and it tends to be worse (probably because more people are using it).
(DIR) Post #ANg4T1RxoVQwQ17DiC by bajax@bajax.us
2022-09-18T04:29:01.993058Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@icscarythings oh damn, that's not what I expected. I thought this was supposed to be good enough for HFT?
(DIR) Post #ANhV2r7MUwWwlUBc12 by icscarythings@froth.zone
2022-09-18T20:39:10.986341Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@bajax Keep in mind I'm in a sort of unsupported region of the US which is why I had the get the RV version. I live in the darkish blue region so coverage is worse here. If you live in the northeast or out west your coverage should be way better, but here it sucks