Post ANBR8GQ4pPGoW5YFvs by lucypeony@spinster.xyz
 (DIR) More posts by lucypeony@spinster.xyz
 (DIR) Post #ANBR8FlfFewaUkdywS by Cousin_Isobel@spinster.xyz
       2022-09-02T23:20:49.881275Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       What do you think about the fact that banning abortion would conflict with some of patriarchy’s current biggest goals?  Surrogacy, for example (at least, as it is currently practiced) requires abortion to be an option in the case of unwanted multiples or a fetus that turns out to have a “defect” that buyers do not want.  It’s harder to attract girls and women to “sex work,” too, if abortion is not an option.  Some will still do it, and have done it, but it will be hard to create the expansion that misogynist progressives want without safe, legal abortion.Do you agree with my assessment, or is it likely that we will end up in full-on Hell, with surrogacy, “sex work,” and no access to abortion?
       
 (DIR) Post #ANBR8GQ4pPGoW5YFvs by lucypeony@spinster.xyz
       2022-09-03T07:03:32.260870Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Cousin_Isobel I don't think so. "sex work" and abortion ban coexist too long. It's still around the world. Men don't care if women would suffer or not. They don't care if enough women would "choose" "sex work". Because no woman who has enough choices would choose to sell her body to random man. Most "sex workers" are human trafficking vicimts already. Abortion is heavilly limited in South American countries. But poverty still drives women into prostitution.