Post AIsu4B1UXYbaX0qKC8 by notbren@pleroma.notbren.xyz
(DIR) More posts by notbren@pleroma.notbren.xyz
(DIR) Post #AIrOiD11A1SWbQhr28 by freedompatriot@socnet.supes.com
2022-04-27T02:17:10Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
(DIR) Post #AIrOvCGnFBOY3THJsu by amerika@noagendasocial.com
2022-04-27T02:19:31Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@freedompatriot This translates to both:1. Tolerate good2. Tolerate badIt's why I am a Platonist: good to the good, and bad to the bad.It's a hybrid of the Golden Rule and the Lex Talionis.
(DIR) Post #AIrQdVJ9vCXnnS4m8G by notbren@pleroma.notbren.xyz
2022-04-27T02:38:02.043283Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@amerikaMaybe you'd like the non aggression principle: Do no harm, Take no Shit 👍@freedompatriot
(DIR) Post #AIsJ4qVKcKRmsaFwhc by amerika@noagendasocial.com
2022-04-27T12:48:45Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@notbren @freedompatriot As long as it included civilization and nature in what it protects, not merely individuals.Then again, in that reading, the non-aggression principle endorses some genocides.
(DIR) Post #AIsPTpJInERG8mvNaq by notbren@pleroma.notbren.xyz
2022-04-27T14:00:08.577164Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@amerika@freedompatriotThat's just a thumb nail. The non aggression principle certainly DOES NOT allow for genocide. Do no harm - its immoral to engage in aggressive violence against someoneTake no shit - it's your right and duty to defend yourself against aggressive violence. Anything you can do that does not harm anyone or their property, is your natural right. Anything else is wrong and can be considered aggression.
(DIR) Post #AIsrCLJfr1h2uSY9k8 by amerika@noagendasocial.com
2022-04-27T19:11:05Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@notbren @freedompatriot The problem is that it is incoherent.If another group moves in near mine, there is a need to remove them, which means the NAP will lead to genocide.
(DIR) Post #AIsrJeeENWIktOeTB2 by amerika@noagendasocial.com
2022-04-27T19:12:24Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@notbren @freedompatriot I have been around for years batting about these topics, and my persistent criticism of libertarianism is that it does not address the civilization question.Like liberalism, it is not a civilization creator, but an attempt to figure out what to do with civilization once it exists.
(DIR) Post #AIsu4B1UXYbaX0qKC8 by notbren@pleroma.notbren.xyz
2022-04-27T19:41:15.131117Z
1 likes, 1 repeats
@amerika@freedompatriot> If another group moves in near mine, there is a need to remove them, which means the NAP will lead to genocide.That's one hell of a non sequitur
(DIR) Post #AIsu8WQcthXu4rfhDc by amerika@noagendasocial.com
2022-04-27T19:44:00Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@notbren @freedompatriot Not a non sequitur since it logically follows from my counterpoint.