Post AEbUP8mJSAflwAdWL2 by Crankenstein@kiwifarms.cc
(DIR) More posts by Crankenstein@kiwifarms.cc
(DIR) Post #AEbTICgWQkVM4X3Xvs by grey@poa.st
2021-12-20T18:24:40.115180Z
5 likes, 5 repeats
whose going to tell him?also, are we meant to believe that they left someone on the moon to operate the camera? or that they had autonomous motion activated cameras that could track the subject, and stream it live to earth, in 1969?
(DIR) Post #AEbTvA6ZxJIZMgoxKi by apropos@freespeechextremist.com
2021-12-20T18:31:47.184525Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@grey >autonomous motion activated camerasthe camera just needs to zoom and turn. The control could be coming from the the lander itself. They had RC Cars in 1966.
(DIR) Post #AEbU0v94UMPohnjUHY by Dicer@poa.st
2021-12-20T18:32:49.391937Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@apropos @grey Good one. Now explain why we don't have self-driving cars
(DIR) Post #AEbU3fPFSkMmlCbo6C by Groomschild@poa.st
2021-12-20T18:33:19.147323Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@grey it could have been the camera had a radio wave sensor and was just following the source of the signal they had that kind of tech back then
(DIR) Post #AEbU4IEd6A2tBYwNSi by inorez@bae.st
2021-12-20T18:33:25.953899Z
5 likes, 0 repeats
@apropos @grey It was from mission control itself, which could control the rover camera autonomously. It had something like a 1-1.5 second time lag so the Apollo 15/16 lunar liftoff footage isn't as nice and smooth as the Apollo 17 one - the camera operator simply got more experience and now had a few days' more experience with the time lag.
(DIR) Post #AEbUGn9RyfOUXvTgUC by apropos@freespeechextremist.com
2021-12-20T18:35:41.728403Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@Dicer @grey 1. we literally do2. you too much a zoomer to know what an RC Car? it's a human controlling it. I feel like ready access to cell phones and computers has eradicated knowledge of simpler systems... I only remembered what was possible recently when I got into synthesizers, which use a lot of very simple audio signals to good effect (sync in/sync out is just regular beeps)
(DIR) Post #AEbUKrP66pe0tQjjrU by jeffcliff@shitposter.club
2021-12-20T18:36:25.560813Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@grey > or that they had autonomous motion activated cameras that could track the subject, and stream it live to earth, in 1969?no you just need a 'tilt on launch / pan down' functionality definitely doable with the tech on the time stream to earth was definitely doable toobut motion tracking would be interesting if they had it
(DIR) Post #AEbUP8mJSAflwAdWL2 by Crankenstein@kiwifarms.cc
2021-12-20T18:37:11.981967Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@jeffcliff @grey They had drone aircraft in the 60s.
(DIR) Post #AEbUVU2tIKRndOPoEy by NathanK@poa.st
2021-12-20T18:38:20.814029Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@apropos @grey it was a preprogrammed series of zoom and tilt steps initiated from Houston. 17 was the only time they got the alignment and timing right.
(DIR) Post #AEbUW7JZIFxdQPWB9M by jeffcliff@shitposter.club
2021-12-20T18:38:27.607699Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Crankenstein @grey at least by the 70's anywaythat's true though; it could be a remote controlled camera
(DIR) Post #AEbUd5uitqMt6kDx2W by Crankenstein@kiwifarms.cc
2021-12-20T18:39:43.222257Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@jeffcliff @grey Well if they had the ability to remote control it isn't a long shot to make a logic system of motion, sound, and light sensors, and make the who shibang wireless
(DIR) Post #AEbUf9Mn29HQOZKev2 by cosmo@poa.st
2021-12-20T18:40:05.483459Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@grey I tried to start a moon hoax thread yesterday but it didnt go aywhere
(DIR) Post #AEbUkCgS7zzI8BwHWS by AGARTHA_NOBLE@goyim.app
2021-12-20T18:40:59.990748Z
3 likes, 0 repeats
@grey They, uh, they did have automatic cameras, bro. It was on the moon rover. That kind of shit isn't super complicated.
(DIR) Post #AEbUxYqL3DsWccvrt2 by inorez@bae.st
2021-12-20T18:43:25.282272Z
4 likes, 0 repeats
@apropos @Dicer @grey It's like seeing people unable to comprehend how a CRT display works because its function is more complex than simply sending a bunch of intensity signal to an array of pixels. How could twisting an electron beam with high precision 60 times a second across hundreds of scan lines possibly work without modern microcontrollers?
(DIR) Post #AEbVPwGjY39vNroHjs by Groomschild@poa.st
2021-12-20T18:48:32.975985Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Dicer @apropos @grey funnily enough there are a lot less variables in space than there are on the road. The road itself is shitty animal or people can pop into the way and the problem of other cars. Also the sensors on self driving car have to be reliable enough to last for years with poor to nonexistent maintenance. While all the equipment for the Apollo program had teams of technicians check and double checking every single part. also the equipment only had to last for a there and back trip at most
(DIR) Post #AEbWrnMMMkqloaHwSO by anonymoose@fedi.club
2021-12-20T19:04:46.144080Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@inorez @apropos @Dicer @grey It’s like seeing people unable to comprehend how a CRT display works because its function is more complex than simply sending a bunch of intensity signal to an array of pixels. How could twisting an electron beam with high precision 60 times a second across hundreds of scan lines possibly work without modern microcontrollers?Yes. Making high-resolution images this way is truly indistinguishable from magic.
(DIR) Post #AEbmJdUs7xmUeB0HZI by Dicer@poa.st
2021-12-20T21:57:53.741957Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@apropos @grey I've seen more than enough accidents to know they aren't what is promised and I don't even have a drivers license