Post ADx1HmLhmfbZKNHE4e by tencarsb@mastodon.social
 (DIR) More posts by tencarsb@mastodon.social
 (DIR) Post #ADvvWHHcm4xURIwFii by martijnbraam@fosstodon.org
       2021-11-30T17:23:05Z
       
       3 likes, 10 repeats
       
       Since people have said the #PinePhone camera has an old film look. Here's a comparison to actual film.The first one is Kodak 200ASA film and the right one is #megapixels
       
 (DIR) Post #ADvvejLeJVWtnWqrk8 by lain@lain.com
       2021-11-30T17:24:39.679338Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @martijnbraam it has more of a 'cheap camera' look
       
 (DIR) Post #ADvwh9hNPk4g3Vjc7E by izaya@social.shadowkat.net
       2021-11-30T17:36:15.519525Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @martijnbraam I always thought it was more early 2000s cheap digital camera than film
       
 (DIR) Post #ADx1HmLhmfbZKNHE4e by tencarsb@mastodon.social
       2021-12-01T06:02:24Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @martijnbraam I still use and develop Film myself, also color, and I think the main reason for the potential of the pinephone camera is the fact that you get a raw file. With artistic use of development tools, like darktable or rawtherapee you can get very much a film look. For me the main limit is, as in all phone cameras no matter what pixel depth or resolution, the lens, and your Kodak 200 shows that very nicely!! Very nice depth of field!
       
 (DIR) Post #AE2KlqUJUQ3OyRxKFs by lars@fulda.social
       2021-12-03T19:32:53Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @martijnbraamLooks good
       
 (DIR) Post #AEA6ofELJR2ETfPFwG by ozoned@mastodon.technology
       2021-12-07T13:35:29Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @martijnbraam Looks great to my unprofessional eyes.