Post ADCghT4IDm5BvyFdjM by lbry@lbry.world
(DIR) More posts by lbry@lbry.world
(DIR) Post #ADCghT4IDm5BvyFdjM by lbry@lbry.world
2021-11-08T21:35:01Z
6 likes, 5 repeats
There's nothing you can say about Kyle Rittenhouse that will get you banned from LBRYBecause we can't ban anyone 💅
(DIR) Post #ADCh83aX3z5GjC0emW by Ricotta@yggdrasil.social
2021-11-08T21:39:53.499676Z
5 likes, 3 repeats
@lbry Kyle Rittenhouse should be prosecuted for missing one target and failing to eliminate another.
(DIR) Post #ADChMeyaqt48jtE9Qm by mian@miniwa.moe
2021-11-08T21:42:01.530934Z
1 likes, 1 repeats
@lbry What if someone file a DMCA claim on some copywrited material.
(DIR) Post #ADChNpFQ9HJ6svebei by clay@indieweb.social
2021-11-08T21:42:21Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@lbry Thanks for posting. I'm looking into how I can make Quanta integrate into LBRY!https://quanta.wiki
(DIR) Post #ADChpMzsmFk3NLWJZA by yes@social.handholding.io
2021-11-08T21:47:43.027404Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@mian @lbry This is true... let's say someone posted something like the following, what would LBRY INC be able to do?My name is INSERT NAME and I am the INSERT TITLE of INSERT COMPANY NAME. A website that your company hosts (according to WHOIS information) is infringing on at least one copyright owned by my company.An article was copied onto your servers without permission. The original ARTICLE/PHOTO, to which we own the exclusive copyrights, can be found at:PROVIDE WEBSITE URLThe unauthorized and infringing copy can be found at:PROVIDE WEBSITE URLThis letter is not an official notification under Section 512(c) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (”DMCA”), but I seek the removal of the aforementioned infringing material from your servers regardless. I request that you immediately notify the infringer of this notice and inform them of their duty to remove the infringing material immediately, and notify them to cease any further posting of infringing material to your server in the future.Please also be advised that law requires you, as a service provider, to remove or disable access to the infringing materials upon receiving this notice. Under US law a service provider, such as yourself, enjoys immunity from a copyright lawsuit provided that you act with deliberate speed to investigate and rectify ongoing copyright infringement. If service providers do not investigate and remove or disable the infringing material this immunity is lost. Therefore, in order for you to remain immune from a copyright infringement action you will need to investigate and ultimately remove or otherwise disable the infringing material from your servers with all due speed should the direct infringer, your client, not comply immediately.
(DIR) Post #ADCjD7p4wjMtDYMGPY by herag@dobbs.town
2021-11-08T22:03:10Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@yesThey are not a service provider@lbry @mian
(DIR) Post #ADCqzp1ELaBilbD2lE by anirudh@social.librem.one
2021-11-08T23:26:26Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@yes @lbry @mian good question. But LBRY is a protocol not a website, so the copyright infringement on LBRY Inc. does not stand as long as they are not seeding that content themselves. LBRY Inc. not seeding something doesn't mean that content is banned on LBRY protocol. As long as the uploader or someone else on LBRY protocol network is seeding that content it will be accessible. That is the beauty of #decentralized P2P networks like LBRY
(DIR) Post #ADCqzpZcHjh4UFIVMG by yes@social.handholding.io
2021-11-08T23:30:27.044379Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@anirudh @lbry @mian the thing is, no one seeds on LBRY in practice.
(DIR) Post #ADCt4hlExWVfc4BblY by anirudh@social.librem.one
2021-11-08T23:44:45Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@yes @lbry @mian That's not a problem of protocol and has nothing to do with banning.Protocols like LBRY provide the power of censorship resistance, its up to creators whether to use it or not.
(DIR) Post #ADCt4iMohoZFUblcKu by yes@social.handholding.io
2021-11-08T23:53:44.085826Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@anirudh @lbry @mian who is to blame is independent from if it's a practical attack vector as the net effect remains unchanged.
(DIR) Post #ADCtCzPNEMQcf5uP2m by yes@social.handholding.io
2021-11-08T23:55:14.695843Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@anirudh @lbry @mian i have tried many many many times to set up a full node and i have failed basically every single time as the documentation is either wrong or just non existent. until that is rectified it's kind of dishonest to make claims about being a decentralized protocol when no one operates in that way in practice.
(DIR) Post #ADCtOT7b67Gc094GBc by Hyolobrika@counter.fedi.live
2021-11-08T23:57:23.562971Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@herag @yes @lbry @mian They are if you are talking about Odysee, not if you are talking about LBRY.
(DIR) Post #ADCutPXiYLq9pjbTrk by anirudh@social.librem.one
2021-11-09T00:12:15Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@yes @lbry @mian you don't need to run a full blockchain node to seed content. Actually seeding is extremely easy just install the desktop app and it will seed all content you watch as long as you allow it. I did run a full LBRY blockchain node previously by following their readme on github, didn't run into any issues. What problems did you face?
(DIR) Post #ADCutQ3ycPe1RmhF9E by yes@social.handholding.io
2021-11-09T00:14:06.871897Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@anirudh @lbry @mian so i can compile it, set up most of it, but when it came time to use it via the LBRY desktop client it simply did not accept it as a valid wallet server.
(DIR) Post #ADDU8QROzcHnMHXobw by andreas@neckbeard.xyz
2021-11-09T06:48:59.775002Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Ricotta @lbry And failing to leave the scene and getting caught.
(DIR) Post #ADDzahqkxQKg2SMw7M by herag@dobbs.town
2021-11-09T12:41:26Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@HyolobrikaMeh, even still, anything to buck the system is good in my book. But with that said, I sort of thought that uploads to Odysee basically got published, but then offloaded to all of the computers in a P2P way so that Odysee didn't actually host any of it, is that not right?@lbry @mian @yes
(DIR) Post #ADEZTAIKuffSI9yMe8 by Hyolobrika@counter.fedi.live
2021-11-09T19:23:36.503660Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@herag @lbry @mian @yes I don't know but whether it does that or not, Odysee is still a point of failure and control. The company can easily blacklist certain content from being displayed on Odysee, even if it's accessible on the LBRY network. That being said, there are alternative frontends to LBRY that will hopefully keep Odysee honest, such as https://madiator.com/ and https://librarian.bcow.xyz/ .PeerTube is still better in some ways though, as it doesn't have that antifeature that LBRY has where ownership of a name is based on a running auction and therefore anyone can take over it any time just by outbidding you.