Post ACzU44g03Xf6DFYLpI by heimdall@chaos.social
 (DIR) More posts by heimdall@chaos.social
 (DIR) Post #ACzU44g03Xf6DFYLpI by heimdall@chaos.social
       2021-11-02T12:18:37Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       #Signal introduces closed-source code in the application for spam protection.Terrible decision if you ask mehttps://signal.org/blog/keeping-spam-off-signal/
       
 (DIR) Post #ACzU459QI9CJgVJqgi by jeybe@social.anoxinon.de
       2021-11-02T12:42:13Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @heimdall To write it a bit less misleading: In the server application, not in the client application
       
 (DIR) Post #ACzULUE0Jwz8NAlF8C by heimdall@chaos.social
       2021-11-02T12:45:22Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @jeybe Yes thanks for the correction!
       
 (DIR) Post #ACzrAH5P7z0pNsMSOm by robby@zoinks.one
       2021-11-02T14:42:56.500202Z
       
       1 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @heimdall If we put this code on the Internet alongside everything else, spammers would just read it and adjust their tactics to gain an advantage in the cat-and-mouse game of keeping spam off the network. If the system doesn’t work if the code is made public, it doesn’t work. It’s as simple as that.
       
 (DIR) Post #AD01Vn7mCjvON7My6y by liaizon@social.wake.st
       2021-11-02T14:10:44Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @heimdall they just keep making bad decisions
       
 (DIR) Post #AD01VngA8tQk5lSQi0 by Hyolobrika@counter.fedi.live
       2021-11-02T18:55:37.220534Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @liaizon @heimdall What's the danger?
       
 (DIR) Post #AD0Z7pb6krhxX8prfs by matse@social.urspringer.de
       2021-11-03T01:13:39Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @heimdall Can't understand it, either. "Closed source, because we wan't to protect you of spammers?" sounds terrible to me.