Post ACCyntlnobLXFVFnKC by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
(DIR) More posts by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
(DIR) Post #9ufxBGcRqw1QacnSXw by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T14:06:00Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
开一个thread保存读《经济学》（罗·萨缪尔森、威廉·诺德豪斯）的随想。
(DIR) Post #9ufxBGs2uwUzN05urI by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T14:09:43Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
“社会经济效益是出自个人的自利行为”既然人都是自利的，那人到达怎样的标准，会变成如今这个人人都【可以】喊打的“资本”？
(DIR) Post #9ufxBH0CQd1LmHuQZE by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T14:47:21Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
市场经济的对面那个，原来是叫command economy啊……中学的政治书管它叫什么来着？忘了
(DIR) Post #9ufxBHCbgUwgOliKuG by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T14:49:58Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
生产要素这个概念有个更简单的称呼：input
(DIR) Post #9ufxBHNF2xS6vkgpU0 by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T14:51:27Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
作为生产要素的“资本”这个概念很明显大家骂的不是它
(DIR) Post #9ufxBHYwLSoHW2AAiW by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T15:03:47Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
那疫情导致的危机应该也是同理。然而危机的时间如果一直持续下去，会不会导致PPF向内移动呢？
(DIR) Post #9ufxBHmPXNaMBoSviK by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T15:13:21Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
进到第二章啦（依旧没有换英文单从这段话来看，“逐利”本身还是没有任何问题啊……继续读
(DIR) Post #9ufxBI3mUnTp3ganmy by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T15:16:43Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
资本的善与恶但资本到底是啥……（我进入复读机阶段
(DIR) Post #9ufxBILrPZwRxl3Ey8 by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T15:25:45Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
经济学是有温度的科学啊
(DIR) Post #9ufxBIaOXXZGgpqqci by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T15:30:30Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
为什么要把教科书写得这么热血啊！（可恶，我好羡慕嫉妒，看看国内的医学教科书，tm是给人读的吗
(DIR) Post #9ufxBInrjSLLMc9bcW by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T15:35:03Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
被骂的那个资本掀开了一点点面纱：垄断和不完全竞争、环境污染。后者我能理解，但是前者产生的根本原因来自哪里呢？
(DIR) Post #9ufxBJ1KvN7Q2OSMcK by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T15:43:34Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
贸易是把专有化的各种input联系起来的纽带啊……
(DIR) Post #9ufxBJDkBF2kesGGxM by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T15:44:49Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
“中国台湾地区”一看就知道是翻译为了过审在加戏
(DIR) Post #9ufxBJbqjcKFrdXWWu by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T15:53:49Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
突然想到，有关效率：咱国的宣传经常吹“集中力量办大事”的效率。然而从经济学的角度来看，这种手段会造成大量的浪费。此效率非彼效率啊。疫情时期的lockdown是特殊手段，会极大降低效率。付出了效率，换得了安全。这样的交换，能被钢炼世界的那个“神”认可吗？又或者，这世界的神，可能其实并不是钢炼世界的那个“等价交换”，而是魔法少女小圆世界的那个骗人签合约的QB？
(DIR) Post #9ufxBJobyAXAVDViQC by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T16:05:13Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
代孕/卖淫，这样“租借身体器官”的行为，和劳动之间的本质区别在哪里？
(DIR) Post #9ufxBK5cwu93LzTIwa by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T16:08:06Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
而在医学这样沉没成本极高的行当上，向体制内“租借劳动力”和卖身为奴又有什么区别呢……（突然抑郁
(DIR) Post #9ufxBKKW3Y3S6ARC9Q by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T16:26:13Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
根本就是卖身为奴啊！在医学体制内往上爬，就像丫鬟爬主子老爷的床一样。爬上去之后，翻身做主子，然后自己也有丫鬟了……（越想越悲伤，别想了
(DIR) Post #9ufxBKWZKjhChY4owC by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T16:28:55Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
回到经济。专业化的分工能够提升效率，但一个人如果在自己的行业上太过专业化的话，应对危机的能力就会大大减弱……在兜底机制几乎没有的咱国，这该怎么办呢？
(DIR) Post #9ufxBKnEKn1VXDs7uK by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T16:46:15Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
有关版权和垄断。我讲讲和我生活比较相关的学术论文发表、阅读和订阅这一块。现状：读论文的人想看文章，写论文的人也特别乐意给他们看，然而就是有中间商赚取大额差价，害得读者只能违反某种道德标准，去上sci-hub前一次对于版权的讨论提到过，版权制度的问题在于垄断。垄断的企业是谁？是出版商。是什么造成了这种垄断的现状？只有少数的几个出版商办杂志，也只有他们的杂志会被学界认可。他们没有对手理论上政府可以做的：1、把出版商拆了不现实，拆了出版商，稿子投给谁？博士生还毕不毕业啦？2、开放学术杂志出版市场但好像开放了也没用，sci名单摆在那里，后来者挺难竞争的那怎么办啊？？？
(DIR) Post #9uhK8Hvb1RbZssGH5c by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T17:08:38Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
垄断这个概念归类在“效率”下面不奇怪，然而公共品和外部性这两个概念，也都是归类在“效率”下面的（而不是“公平”），这真的是要读完里面的内容之后，才能理解啊……
(DIR) Post #9uhK8I6aMaOaQxP3Dc by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T17:19:50Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
医学和经济学也有类似之处啊。医学研究了每个阶段的胚胎和胎儿各自发育到了怎样的程度，但医学本身并不能决定女性对堕胎的选择。
(DIR) Post #9uhK8IHvgPTB08i6ts by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T17:36:03Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
市场不灵的部分讲了好多概念，然而政府不灵的部分只用一段就带过去了，接着用小字介绍了两个奥派的科学家，然后这一章就总结陈词了……
(DIR) Post #9uhK8IVOsKFFfv0rtg by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T06:22:16Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
与其价格管制，不如发放补贴……是这个意思吗？
(DIR) Post #9uhK8InTn6hsZzTJ4q by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T06:38:05Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
这题做起来感觉怪怪的，是因为现实生活中，毒品的供给弹性极大吗？
(DIR) Post #9uhK8IvdInEEzHHomm by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T07:14:16Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
普通消费者，作为一个总体，可以富有智慧地用货币在市场中投票。那么同理，普通的公民群体，也完全有能力用民主投票来获得更好的政治结果。所谓“中国人缺乏民主素质”、“开放投票的话就会选上某偶像”这类的论断，都是不符合数学和科学依据的。
(DIR) Post #9uhK8JAWPR8djSFhzc by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T07:18:03Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
微观经济学的好多概念，都要用消费和生产来讲两遍，这个样子让我想到了复式记账法……
(DIR) Post #9uhK8JLrjGDEIdYlfs by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T07:48:21Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
为什么要把收入弹性和需求价格弹性给分为两个概念讲呢？这一部分的逻辑没搞懂欸……
(DIR) Post #9uhK8JVR9frumK2Paq by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T08:07:45Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
不论我变得多有钱，我都会买骨头来烧汤！（振声
(DIR) Post #9uhK8JgQUoevKPBBiq by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T08:16:17Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
劣品的概念一出来，我就瞬间明白收入弹性和需求价格弹性的区别了有钱了就可以抛弃普通骨头，去买带肉的骨头；而没钱的时候，虽然骨头价格下跌，但我还是会选择多买一点没肉的骨头……吃货经济学！
(DIR) Post #9uhK8K4t1sE0YGciqe by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T08:21:34Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
人造黄油是负的我能理解，可为什么猪肉也是负的……明明挺好吃的呀……我不懂美国。
(DIR) Post #9uhK8KGwJ3rl9eGLdQ by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T08:31:07Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
第5章啃完，自省
(DIR) Post #9uhK8KWtLkctx7j5V2 by fanchuanjingming@bgme.me
2020-05-04T08:48:17Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@maoyaoyao 看完微经别忘了宏经
(DIR) Post #9uhKGdmzcuVg0CDib2 by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T08:49:50Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@fanchuanjingming 嗯嗯。不过我还早着呢，宏观经济学要到第20章才开始
(DIR) Post #9uhKMH451oY1GFtnBQ by fanchuanjingming@bgme.me
2020-05-04T08:50:52Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@maoyaoyao 我本科专业是这个，看到文字虎躯一震……
(DIR) Post #9uhNShf7LultLqypDE by blablaboom@digforfire.org
2020-05-04T09:25:35Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@fanchuanjingming @maoyaoyao 这是所有商课学生看到都会虎躯一震的两门课 :0520:
(DIR) Post #9uhQQiTZehZ99uKCga by fanchuanjingming@bgme.me
2020-05-04T09:58:53Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@blablaboom @maoyaoyao 商科生流下了痛苦的泪水，我不喜欢商科，不过我已经毕业多年啦啦啦
(DIR) Post #9uhimTPM9nQ5yJsO9o by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T13:12:11Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@peach 诶？这样啊……（又暴露自己的浅薄无知了！我本来是感觉它名字里面带有经济，另外一个是几个依稀记得的名词，什么劳动价值啊，剩余价值啊，剥削啊，生产资料所有制啊……这些词听上去也真的蛮经济的……所以以为马克思他老人家想要通过这些理论讲经济问题
(DIR) Post #9uhimTYvaD4mS0M24m by magma@o3o.ca
2020-05-04T13:24:30Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@maoyaoyao 这个帖子真长啊
(DIR) Post #9uhizW7xMFCAAcxPqy by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T13:26:52Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@magma 我把这条当作啃课本的“弹幕”来用的 :blobcatcoffee: 以后再想起这本书的时候，搜个关键词，点开第一条，就直接可以回顾读书时候的一整串感想啦
(DIR) Post #9uhmirZAnKKFYX0B5E by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T12:46:04Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
知识，是一种生产资料吗？如果是的话，那知识到底算是一种劳动，还是算是一种资本呢？
(DIR) Post #9uhmirj6CQGW3Je6YS by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T13:05:25Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
经济学的课本读到现在（没读多少……），给我一个感觉，就……中学和大学必修政治课上讲的那种马克思经济学，在真·经济学中的地位……大概就像中医在现代医学体系里面的地位吧
(DIR) Post #9uhmirt1bWCmY6I21g by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T13:19:34Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
之前书里提到了input和output，现在终于读到function啦（有点像程序员会学的东西
(DIR) Post #9uhmis1t4ZIIzaR6q8 by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T13:35:16Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
住…住口！（恼羞成怒
(DIR) Post #9uhmisG4DqdXhZ4QwS by fanchuanjingming@bgme.me
2020-05-04T14:08:40Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@maoyaoyao 边际效益的计算方法是求导……
(DIR) Post #9uho10YyBReicq7g8W by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T13:46:14Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
“生产不仅仅是种土豆和炼钢铁”我觉得你在cue共产主义的理论，但我没有证据 :sickmeme:
(DIR) Post #9uho10pzABGbTc5Geu by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T13:52:26Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
这个问题的答案……中医看病？（抓紧一切机会嘲讽中医
(DIR) Post #9uho119TzgrYS5Cq36 by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T14:03:30Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
这就是大家说的“劣币驱逐良币”吗？
(DIR) Post #9uho11ILSjx4tZLurY by magma@o3o.ca
2020-05-04T14:23:09Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@maoyaoyao 对，所以政府监管是必要的，但是当政府与资本市场同流合污时，他们就联合打败了整个世界的市场，于是就爆发了贸易战。
(DIR) Post #9uhorqmNI2v7d5adqy by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T14:26:26Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
有关网络。书里的小字部分有点长，所以就不截图了。作者总结了网络市场的三个特质：鼓励冒尖（tipping）、历史因袭、赢家通吃……现在想想，作者挺了不起。他们编书的时代，主流的Windows系统还是win98.在那个web2.0的黄金年代，就已经用总结的这三个特质预见到了：网络总有一天会变成现在这个中心化的鬼样子。不愧是大牛经济学家啊……
(DIR) Post #9uhorqx0eVQYA4Z8Qi by pearl0513@pawoo.net
2020-05-04T14:28:36Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@maoyaoyao 因为自由经济逐渐导致垄断在其他领域也是常事了。
(DIR) Post #9uhorr9lt3dSneXKK0 by magma@o3o.ca
2020-05-04T14:32:42Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@pearl0513 @maoyaoyao 所以资本主义吸纳了反垄断法，活到了现在。
(DIR) Post #9uhpBDGJvHtQrSpV8C by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T14:36:12Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@magma 是不是可以这么说：与其说是发达国家的资本将成本（比如）转嫁到发展中国家，不如说是所有的资本都想要把这种成本转嫁到外部……只不过，现在发达国家的政府有能力在本国内制止这一行为；而发展中国家的政府，既没有这个能力，有时也缺乏这么做的动力
(DIR) Post #9uhpEOG7UfmpptFcfY by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T14:36:47Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@magma 是不是可以这么说：与其说是发达国家的资本将成本（比如污染，比如社会不公）转嫁到发展中国家，不如说是所有的资本都想要把这种成本转嫁到外部……只不过，现在发达国家的政府有能力在本国内制止这一行为；而发展中国家的政府，既没有这个能力，有时也缺乏这么做的动力
(DIR) Post #9uhpL6NGO4gGOVnCYi by pearl0513@pawoo.net
2020-05-04T14:37:59Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@magma @maoyaoyao 资本主义还引入了福利概念呢。都是超级聪明的做法。
(DIR) Post #9uhphBmQy7FbX168MC by magma@o3o.ca
2020-05-04T14:42:00Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@maoyaoyao 一定程度上是的，发展中国家应该也是包括民主程度这一项的，但很多时候以贫穷落后为主的烂底子无法发挥民主提高生产力的作用。
(DIR) Post #9uhqG2BGeQY7tXKSwq by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-04T14:48:17Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@magma 民主……提高的到底是生产力本身，还是生产和分配的效率呢？或者都有？
(DIR) Post #9uhqtSu7ECbc4N6nAG by magma@o3o.ca
2020-05-04T14:55:25Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@maoyaoyao 都有吧。
(DIR) Post #ACCynjtwVTuqdqz9cm by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T14:12:37Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@maoyaoyao 字好模糊啊。
(DIR) Post #ACCynkQYYE0IH0FCSW by maoyaoyao@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T14:15:06Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@KagurazakaInkscape 从网上随便搜的扫描版pdf，全损画质😂
(DIR) Post #ACCynlAHoCaEYpdijo by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T14:17:56Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@maoyaoyao 還是找 en 版吧，可去 libgen.is 或 mises.org 看看。
(DIR) Post #ACCynlohNwuSaAXzjE by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2020-05-03T14:30:58Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@maoyaoyao 亦可看看這本（我自己沒看過）。https://twitter.com/Shaysreb/status/1186587013249527813
(DIR) Post #ACCynmIpZv0q5ce3hA by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-03T09:22:00Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@maoyaoyao 似乎不厚，我自己先讀一下。
(DIR) Post #ACCynmu3LWmpx43miG by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-03T10:50:30Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Many laymen, including libertarians, have a poor understanding of IP concepts and law, and often confuse copyrights, trademarks, and patents.與 RMS 視角不同，後者強調 IP 概念雜糅多項內容，有誤導性。https://cdn.mises.org/Against%20Intellectual%20Property_2.pdf#14
(DIR) Post #ACCynnSRHgIBfi9FJI by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-03T10:59:53Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Ayn Rand mistakenly assumes that the first to file has priority (and then she is at pains to defend such a system). See Ayn Rand, “Patents and Copyrights,” in Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal (New York: New American Library, 1967), p. 133. @AynRand_NY@twitter.com 果然只是個 Mary Sue 作者，懂個屁的 libertarian 。守夜子誠不我欺。https://twitter.com/Fear_8964_oich/status/1348158522492559365
(DIR) Post #ACCynnxdPhFJESk9w0 by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-03T11:05:13Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
However, since patents are government-granted monopolies, it is not unjust to use an anti-monopoly law to limit the ability of a patent owner to extend this monopoly beyond the bounds intended by the patent statute. The problem with antitrust laws is in their application to normal, peaceful business dealings, not to limit real—i.e., government-granted—monopolies. 看來 @CaptainYukinoshitaHachiman 所稱之 Capitalism vs Corporatism 真實存在，並非其瞎編的。😃
(DIR) Post #ACCynoUbR7cKsiAUK0 by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-03T11:19:29Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
A similar point might be made with regard to Bill Gates, whose fortune has largely been built based on the government-granted monopoly inherent in copyright. Moreover, as Bill Gates is no libertarian, and doubtlessly does not oppose the legitimacy of antitrust laws, one can hardly wring one’s hands in pity over his having to lie in the very bed he helped make.因此， UMP45 大小姐此番言辭就很耐人尋味。https://twitter.com/Shaysreb/status/1266043779208712192
(DIR) Post #ACCynp09Xor2SYvgUy by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-03T11:27:55Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
a right in every physical version of the book, or, at least, to every book within the jurisdiction of the legal system that recognizes the copyright.首段 every 為斜體，起突出作用（廢話）。揭示了 IP 與經典產權之不同：後者僅討論少數物品與個體之間關係，具有天然的小政府性。https://cdn.mises.org/Against%20Intellectual%20Property_2.pdf#15
(DIR) Post #ACCynpYXTyMOBD1960 by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-03T11:33:10Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
B does not own the “novel” itself, and is not entitled to make a copy of the novel, 傳說中的「 your device is not yours 」？
(DIR) Post #ACCynq59WiRpoMHBvk by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-03T11:36:08Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
In this way, A’s ownership of ideal rights gives him some degree of control—ownership—over the tangible property of innumerable others.
(DIR) Post #ACCynqZzg37NM0hp0C by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-03T12:19:00Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Both are the product of one’s labor and one’s mind. Because one owns one’s labor, one has a natural law right to the fruit of one’s labor. Under this view, just as one has a right to the crops one plants, so one has a right to the ideas one generates and the art one produces.@hiyajyomaho @jaychou @machan 感覺是在看勞動價值論，是我左經未讀好嗎？https://cdn.mises.org/Against%20Intellectual%20Property_2.pdf#17
(DIR) Post #ACCynr8jasuJ5kxZ9U by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-03T12:32:06Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
With respect to copyright and patent, the idea is that more artistic and inventive “innovation” corresponds with, or leads to, more wealth. Public goods and free-rider effects reduce the amount of such wealth below its optimal level,「要看是姓『社』還是姓『資』的問題。判斷的標準，應該主要看是否有利於發展資本主義社會的生產力，是否有利於增強資本主義國家的綜合國力，是否有利於提高人民的生活水平。」https://cdn.mises.org/Against%20Intellectual%20Property_2.pdf#18
(DIR) Post #ACCynrljFu6D2hChvs by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-03T12:38:18Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Modern opponents include Rothbard, McElroy, Palmer, Lepage, Bouckaert, and myself.感覺作者很不謙遜的樣子，是文化差異嗎？
(DIR) Post #ACCynsJ3G0koi2nJs8 by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-03T13:06:36Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
To ask whether a law should be enacted or exist is to ask: is it proper to use force against certain people in certain circumstances? It is no wonder that this question is not really addressed by analysis of wealth maximization. Utilitarian analysis is thoroughly confused and bankrupt: talk about increasing the size of the pie is methodologically flawed; 感覺是在罵 #入關 學。
(DIR) Post #ACCynt0IfDLgsB1rHc by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-03T13:56:14Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
“patents are the heart and core of property rights.”原來 @AynRand_NY@twitter.com 其實如此狂熱嗎！
(DIR) Post #ACCyntJRW2f3pXz97Y by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-05T14:16:53Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Even if overall wealth is increased due to IP laws, it does not follow that this allegedly desirable result justifies the unethical violation of some individuals’ rights to use their own property as they see fit.此段開始多角度批判功利主義。https://cdn.mises.org/Against%20Intellectual%20Property_2.pdf#20
(DIR) Post #ACCyntlnobLXFVFnKC by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-04T04:54:30Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Jefferson recognized that because ideas are not scarce, patent and copyright are not natural rights, and can be justified only, if at all, on the utilitarian grounds of promoting useful inventions and literary works (and, even then, they must be created by statute, since they are not natural rights). See Palmer, “Intellectual Property: A Non-Posnerian Law and Economics Approach,” p. 278 n. 53.Timeline 上某「暴論」之出處？https://cdn.mises.org/Against%20Intellectual%20Property_2.pdf#32
(DIR) Post #ACCynuNNYtP782pntY by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-04T08:56:12Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
It is not surprising that, as Palmer notes, “[m]onopoly privilege and censorship lie at the historical root of patent and copyright.”世界線收束。https://cdn.mises.org/Against%20Intellectual%20Property_2.pdf#35
(DIR) Post #ACCynuw7TjC2rn5Y2q by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-05T11:14:53Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
By focusing on creation and labor, rather than on first occupancy of scarce resources, as the touchstone of property rights, IP advocates are led to place undue stress on the importance of “rewarding” the labor of the creator, much as Adam Smith’s flawed labor theory of value led to Marx’s even more deeply-flawed communist views on exploitation.我想， @AshenElaina 等一定記得夜闌星空虛無前的那句指控。https://cdn.mises.org/Against%20Intellectual%20Property_2.pdf#41
(DIR) Post #ACCynvPth10qM91KSW by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-05T14:18:14Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@CaptainYukinoshitaHachiman 之中文版。https://community.geph.io/t/topic/311
(DIR) Post #ACCynvcIwswAycpEnY by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-05T13:09:46Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
the other somehow contains more mystical “rights-essence” within its covers. ... According to Rothbard, BOOK2 is “missing” the “right to copy,” much like an electronic toy that is sold “batteries not included.” It is as if there is an invisible, mystical tendril of “reproduction-ownership” stretching from BOOK2 back to its true owner A, wherever he may be.可見 @AshenElaina 為虛假的魔女， Rothbard 才是真正的魔女。https://cdn.mises.org/Against%20Intellectual%20Property_2.pdf#49
(DIR) Post #ACCynwJCNPFT7etUem by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-05T13:40:50Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
In libertarianism, we live by right, not permission. We do not need to find permission to take actions with our own property. Contrary to practice in totalitarian societies, all things that are not forbidden are permitted. The reservation-of-rights view would reverse this by assuming that every use of property is valid only if that particular use-right can be somehow found or located in the property.https://cdn.mises.org/Against%20Intellectual%20Property_2.pdf#53
(DIR) Post #ACCynx2ZehXpOO7jNo by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-10-10T03:05:06Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
「臺灣雖然不被 黑箱作業的 ACTA 邀請入列, 但因為在 "科技產品遭低價挑戰" 一事上面, 與歐美日韓利益與共, 再加上某些人因為敵視中國共產黨而連帶 ( 隨意畫等號地) 敵視所有中國人乃至所有中國產品, 所以很可以接受 『山寨等於仿冒等於劣質品等於黑心貨』。 另一方面看看中國, 只需要訴諸民族情感, 說打擊仿冒才能保有民族創造力, 大家也就真的相信 『山寨等於仿冒』 了。 殊不知民族情緒高張者, 在參與 "「仿冒」 謀殺 「盜版」 和 「山寨」" 的言論當中, 雖然不能算是漢奸 (不知者無罪, ok?), 實際上卻已在協助歐美日韓打壓中國自身產業的崛起。 」關於智慧財產權的大雜燴性與商標權之問題皆老生常談。但民族主義問題似乎鮮有討論。https://www.cyut.edu.tw/~ckhung/g/ofset/post.php?id=109d
(DIR) Post #ACCynx6TQCfDaTwqSe by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-05T11:53:25Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
But the advocates of the contractual approach to IP aremistaken if they believe that private contract can be usedto recreate the same type of protection afforded by mod-ern IP rights.正如之前李笑來所謂「應用區塊鏈保護版權」其實只是保護具名權一樣，之前 Timeline 所轉之「某平臺用加水印方法幫助找出傳播盜版者」，同樣是對版權概念之濫用。https://cdn.mises.org/Against%20Intellectual%20Property_2.pdf#46
(DIR) Post #ACCynyQiUQRzhYQWeW by KagurazakaInkscape@mastodon.social
2021-02-05T14:11:12Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
It is not surprising that IP attorneys, artists, and inventors often seem to take for granted the legitimacy of IP. However, those more concerned with liberty, truth, and rights should not take for granted the institutionalized use of force used to enforce IP rights. Instead, we should reassert the primacy of individual rights over our bodies and homesteaded scarce resources.@maoyaoyao 結尾其實也是我看此書之意圖——並非要對線飛鳥段、阿爾貝特等，而是希望更準確認識偏指、文昭等。https://cdn.mises.org/Against%20Intellectual%20Property_2.pdf#59