Post AATqaGttI6Xqq9GeDg by quad@weeaboo.space
(DIR) More posts by quad@weeaboo.space
(DIR) Post #AATnsYKwtyHkGgwv9U by quad@weeaboo.space
2021-08-19T10:09:17.147089Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
I want to try forwarding the Hetzner IPs to my home soon, but dunno how I should do it. If it's best to cram it onto my RB4011 and mess around with everything there, or have a separate router in front that handles it
(DIR) Post #AAToZPHcRHMedmpHLU by quad@weeaboo.space
2021-08-19T10:17:01.644144Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Basically I dunno if I should go for option 1 or option 2
(DIR) Post #AATpFDtVAnmvTsU8Fk by quad@weeaboo.space
2021-08-19T10:24:35.053637Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Option 1 means most of my home keeps going as it has until now, NAT'ed through a dynamic IP from ISP. But it means one box having to handle both my private and public networks. Which means it's rather easy to make routing fuckups, like allowing a public server to route or NAT straight into a 10.x.x.x network, and config would probably be messier.Option 2 means my whole home would essentially have a static IP. Config would be piss easy and hard to fuck up as the outer router barely even needs to have a firewall enabled.But it also means all my stuff would be routed through Hetzner and it looks like I live in 🅱️​inland. Plus more points of failure. Hetzner issues would cut out everything, not just the public IPs.
(DIR) Post #AATpJviGCMIUXZTHGq by qeef@en.osm.town
2021-08-19T10:23:26Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@quad Be green and go for 1.
(DIR) Post #AATpJw7mfSiJojPf3Q by quad@weeaboo.space
2021-08-19T10:25:25.481051Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@qeef not entirely sure what you mean by be green. I doubt there's that much of a difference in power consumption.Or do you mean one less IPv4 address "wasted"?
(DIR) Post #AATqTloHyHbmg4Xz2O by qeef@en.osm.town
2021-08-19T10:33:15Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@quad guess that interlink will be private IPv4 anyway?But two devices mean two power supplies. Surely it's not big deal, but doing it just to avoid configuration is kind of.. unfortunate, IMO :)
(DIR) Post #AATqTmKY2LPeI7dkJs by quad@weeaboo.space
2021-08-19T10:38:24.229240Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@qeef Frankly the main question here is whether or not I want a static ip on the RB4011
(DIR) Post #AATqUhhYjSgiDzqQbI by quad@weeaboo.space
2021-08-19T10:38:36.338926Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@qeef (And thus everything that NAT'ed behind it)
(DIR) Post #AATqaGOLBPJ9GIVS2i by loke@functional.cafe
2021-08-19T10:34:49Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@quad No chance to get the IPv6 stuff working agian?
(DIR) Post #AATqaGttI6Xqq9GeDg by quad@weeaboo.space
2021-08-19T10:39:35.953906Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@loke I plan to nab Hetzner IPv6 space or something using the same method if that's what you mean.If you mean my ISP's IPv6 that works, it's just not reliable enough for me to consider actually using it
(DIR) Post #AATrTvfLQaQvCO0GAK by aurorus@chaos.social
2021-08-19T10:45:45Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@quad keep in mind you’ll need your dynamic ip for some stuff like netflix.
(DIR) Post #AATrTw6dn6GeZ2m3iC by quad@weeaboo.space
2021-08-19T10:49:39.353373Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@aurorus I don't use anything like that.Except maybe YouTube, but I generally use it via clients like NewPipe so I doubt it's affected too much
(DIR) Post #AATs81PhTf3ablnrvM by benis@cawfee.club
2021-08-19T10:56:54.985812Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@quad increase your mene power, embrace 🅱️inlan
(DIR) Post #AATvUULgsQesaCKfc8 by wolf480pl@mstdn.io
2021-08-19T11:34:32Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@quad flip it. Put "other router" behind RB4011. All it needs anyway is a VPN to hetzner, right?
(DIR) Post #AATxFj7LsuaRx4iM5o by quad@weeaboo.space
2021-08-19T11:54:18.867059Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@wolf480pl I could. Considered just virtualization a VyOS router to VPN the subnet.Not sure how much of a mess it'd be with stuff like the QoS I do on the RB4011 though
(DIR) Post #AATzXcomFFLXXDgkbo by wolf480pl@mstdn.io
2021-08-19T12:19:54Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@quad hmm if not... maybe RB has virtual router functions?
(DIR) Post #AAUAFFYn4rCJgXeSY4 by quad@weeaboo.space
2021-08-19T14:19:53.813480Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@wolf480pl not sure what you mean by virtual router functions? You mean a virtualized router? Doubt it, RouterOS can do vms on x86 I think but I haven’t heard much about it
(DIR) Post #AAUAgT8Ej4w9b0D5Vo by wolf480pl@mstdn.io
2021-08-19T14:24:48Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@quad VRF.Like two routers in one, but without VMs or containers.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_routing_and_forwardinghttps://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/networking/vrf.html
(DIR) Post #AAUBntHxyQ56hXrdDs by quad@weeaboo.space
2021-08-19T14:37:21.743410Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@wolf480pl oh vrf, dunno, never really worked with it
(DIR) Post #AAUDSahISQ9JfueWH2 by wolf480pl@mstdn.io
2021-08-19T14:55:54Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@quad IIRC @nihl did