Post AAS0MsVbHJfGeREpUm by Divnanata@social.quodverum.com
 (DIR) More posts by Divnanata@social.quodverum.com
 (DIR) Post #AAS0MsVbHJfGeREpUm by Divnanata@social.quodverum.com
       2021-08-18T13:19:49Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       Oh the irony….https://nl.nytimes.com/f/a/9eDiMpxlkJID9e3DAAAKjA~~/AAAAAQA~/RgRi_2aAP0S6aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cubnl0aW1lcy5jb20vYnkvYWRhbS1saXB0YWs_Y2FtcGFpZ25faWQ9OSZlbWM9ZWRpdF9ubl8yMDIxMDgxOCZpbnN0YW5jZV9pZD0zODE3MSZubD10aGUtbW9ybmluZyZyZWdpX2lkPTY4NzE4ODYyJnNlZ21lbnRfaWQ9NjY1MjQmdGU9MSZ1c2VyX2lkPTgxOWRmYjg5MWM1NGJlZGI4MTg3NDU1ZTJiMmM5MWUyVwNueXRCCmEagOEcYapftzNSFGRpdm5hLm5hdGFAZ21haWwuY29tWAQAAAAA
       
 (DIR) Post #AAS1HcQbjo0NHhxW8O by Divnanata@social.quodverum.com
       2021-08-18T13:30:04Z
       
       0 likes, 3 repeats
       
       By Adam LiptakThe Supreme Court may reconsider a major case concerning freedom of the press. …Gorsuch said it was time for the Supreme Court to take another look at the case. “What started in 1964 with a decision to tolerate the occasional falsehood to ensure robust reporting by a comparative handful of print and broadcast outlets,” he wrote in a dissenting opinion, “has evolved into an ironclad subsidy for the publication of falsehoods by means and on a scale previously unimaginable.”
       
 (DIR) Post #AAS1vkDsB2912h8Tho by DeWalt@social.quodverum.com
       2021-08-18T13:37:19Z
       
       0 likes, 2 repeats
       
       @Divnanata It shows how big of a snowball a bad Supreme Court decision can make in 60 years.
       
 (DIR) Post #AAS2aOUfryvLWYNTl2 by Divnanata@social.quodverum.com
       2021-08-18T13:44:39Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats