Post A8sTbRADjPyx5HEvxI by incel_lolbert@poa.st
 (DIR) More posts by incel_lolbert@poa.st
 (DIR) Post #A8sQKr5Jnz82guLfY8 by search_social@neckbeard.xyz
       2021-07-02T11:29:04.675789Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       “people doing stuff for power and profit” is not capitalism, it’s just nature of people in power and capitalism restricts this with property principlesThe problem is property cannot be reduced to a single owner. A road or a river; and the homesteads that line it; interact communally.leftism and big government-ism is hidden in the phrase “introducing a new culture”, that’s how the “ culture” is being “introduced”Leftism and big government-ism is hidden in the phrase “contract” and “consent”. There is no escaping it and an ideology that openly admits its nature is more trustworthy than an ideology that hides it.@incel_lolberttree-vs-semilattice.jpg
       
 (DIR) Post #A8sRh97TX63GwxYBSi by incel_lolbert@poa.st
       2021-07-02T11:44:19.285831Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @search_social Of course we live in a society, this doesn't really change a lot> Leftism and big government-ism is hidden in the phrase “contract” and “consentthere is a difference between positive and negative rights, but both require some power structure. But in the second case it won't be "big gov" as a decision making center, it would be a framework for people to make their own decisions and cooperate. > There is no escaping it and an ideology that openly admits its natureAny ideology would be somewhat abstract. But I dont think that if someone openly says "I'll rob and kill you", the honesty makes it any better
       
 (DIR) Post #A8sSNCHu8yQawFTpA0 by search_social@neckbeard.xyz
       2021-07-02T11:51:54.195723Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Of course we live in a society, this doesn’t really change a lotIt changes everything because “society” has no single owner and “property” as a concept cannot deal with things without single owners.it would be a framework for people to make their own decisions and cooperate.You mean a “culture”? Which as you admit is just leftism and big government masquerading under your fancy words.But I dont think that if someone openly says “I’ll rob and kill you”, the honesty makes it any betterIf you know what someone is going to do you can ask why. And if you know why then you can remove their incentive to do so. If your wife and kids were starving and monsanto is leaving their crop to rot to raise the price are you going to let your wife and kids die to respect NAP or are you going to take the food? And if some guard is getting paid to defend monsanto’s actions would he rather you kill him or negotiate with you to look the other way?triangles.jpeg
       
 (DIR) Post #A8sTbRADjPyx5HEvxI by incel_lolbert@poa.st
       2021-07-02T12:05:41.707965Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @search_social society exists, well, local government exists as well, joint stock and private property also exists, that's not a contradiction I said that cultural degeneracy spreads when big gov makes it impossible to escape it. We know what the motivations of our current adversaries are. They want to keep power forever and see whites as a danger to this project, there's not much you can negotiate. Or if a black gand attack you, they want your stuff and to assert power over territory, there's nothing you can negotiate either