Post A63GLd3dCZ1mZJiHBY by TooDamnOld@degenerates.fail
(DIR) More posts by TooDamnOld@degenerates.fail
(DIR) Post #A633jHddBuPLgRV6ye by bigmattoidchimpin@degenerates.fail
2021-04-08T21:02:51.451Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
I don't know about all the positing a new race stuff, but this apparent dilemma has already been resolved. Now, I know the gays, civ nats, and boomers want some apparent distinction offishully observed on the Internut between "bad Afros," whom they claim to recognize as "niggers," and "good Afros," whom they will refer to by the formal identifier like African or "afroamerican." It's not likely to play out that way, especially when everyone with a clue already understands that this overall idea or 'naming' / fake taxonomy scheme isn't exactly novel. Actually, a similar or essentially equivalent lowbrow concept has existed for decades 'on the streets' so to speak, or just in the analog world prior to all the relatively normie cuck nats & boomers trying and failing to force this concept into general usage on social media and the like- i.e., I'm referring to the already prevalent conformist notion among MTV watchers and the like that "black people and niggers are not one and the same," or "not all black people are 'niggers,' in fact most black people aren't niggers and cannot be thought of as such because to be considered a 'nigger' one has to meet all of this arbitrary criteria that I subjectively conjured 15 minutes ago," etc. Don't get me wrong, I totally get the primary concern or motivation for pushing this, or at least what usually constitutes the motivation for pursuing or shilling this line of reasoning. We all received our mandatory socialization (or Clockwork Orange experience) on the dark powers of this so-called "ugly N word," and we all get that you guys don't want decent black people referred to or thought of as "niggers." Fortunately, as a practical matter of 'real life' we all know or should know that white people essentially adhere to that same aforementioned "nice/good blacks aren't or don't get called 'niggers'" disposition albeit in many if not most cases that 'MO' will indirectly result from living with common sense, propriety, and basic white decency as opposed to any formal embrace of some largely unnecessary neo-nigger revisionist theory (it's also completely unnecessary as a practical matter, unless it's intended to lay the foundation for new/derivative forms of language policing in the future). I don't want you to feel like I'm leaving you empty-handed, especially if you truly intended finding a label for maintaining the good blahpipo as nominally separate and distinct from all that "real nigger" riff-raff. As I stated initially, the good news is that this dilemma has been resolved.Nor does one need any hyphenated-Americanism, mental gymnastics, etc. The other piece o' good news is that the final resolution to this dilemma recognizes and incorporates your main concerns. First, we have the usual garden-variety trad niggers of course, or the so-called "real niggers" in boomerspeak. No changes required there, obviously. But what PC term to use for labeling the well-behaved blacks and the well-educated blacks and yes, sure, even Candace Owens, as Candace constitutes a real outlier in the respect that at least she feigns willingness to read books. :hyper_think: I am also obviously thinking of the highly esteemed black conservative intellectuals like Thomas Sowell and Clarence Thomas. At the very least, we will require a term that denotes class, sophistication, worldliness, high education, and all that good stuff . . .Well, to cut to the chase, that's why we call them nhiggers as nhiggers are the 'Taylorist' huwhite answer to traditional basic niggers. The term nhigger satisfies all of the prerequisite elements and conditions for a suitable term. The first implicit element was obv that the term not be "nigger" and mean something entirely different in terms of connotation and denotation. Don't judge a book by its cover or in this case a term by its spelling; in reality, when pronounced 'properly' nhigger fortunately does not sound very much like the big scary "N-word" at all. Nhigger not only satisfies all the basic requirements, but perhaps in homage to its noble class members, the term goes above and beyond to exceed all basic requirements and normie expectations. For one, nhigger is a complimentary term and has no value as an insult, much like "huwhite" as a term in respect to how it is/was applied in Internet usage. Moreover, as with 'huwhite' the term nhigger implicitly connotes 'Ivy League' or prestige intellectual status, high income, a relatively above-average level of cultural refinement, and so forth and so on. The only potentially 'problematic' aspect of applying this term for its intended purpose is that the connotation described above is so one-sided or 'severe' in its exclusive association with the praiseworthy, high quality, high class and arguably even 'high caste' attributes that I'm not yet fully comfortable with recognizing Candace Owens as a true nhigger but some people would surely disagree with me there. Of course, some subjectivity is unavoidable in making assessments like these for oneself. Don't misinterpret me here, as I recognize that most people would not hesitate for one second in assigning Candace to the non-nigger nhigger realm, and as a technical matter she would mos' def beez a nhigger. I'm just referencing petty preferences in terms of what one is personally comfortable with when it comes to labeling or referencing a particular individual. For example, I'd have absolutely no problem calling Thomas Sowell or Clarence Thomas a total nhigger . . . but Owens? I'm not sure she's there yet.RE: https://noagendasocial.com/users/PawelK/statuses/106027044732579134
(DIR) Post #A6346Bj3L8U40SxUZc by tfmonkey@paypig.org
2021-04-08T21:07:05Z
1 likes, 1 repeats
@bigmattoidchimpin I think you're overthinking it.Step 1: abolish all welfare programs whatsoever.Step 2: Shoot anyone who riots.That's it.The good blacks will be able to rebuild after that, and the shitty blacks will be fertilizing the grass.
(DIR) Post #A6356LhYLlGOtrtiIy by TheMadPirate@freespeechextremist.com
2021-04-08T21:16:41.286291Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@bigmattoidchimpin @tfmonkey Step 1 is needed in order for Nature to select those with the ability to survive and thrive. By abolishing you avoid subsidizing laziness and bad decision. Of course in order for this to work it requires having no empathy. If a black person decides to still take bad decisions in life and ends up dying because o that, well, that¡s just the nature of life. Step 2 is required in order if who took bad life choices try to resists the consequences of their own bad choices by "bailing self-out" , that is, trying to take from others what they wouldn't achieve by themselves. Again, in order for this to work, it requires no empathy. Those who end up shot were just asking for it.
(DIR) Post #A635bnVwzade8ZSywq by TooDamnOld@degenerates.fail
2021-04-08T21:21:48.425Z
2 likes, 1 repeats
I'm still trying to figure out why "colored" is an insult, but "people of color" isn't. And the National Association of COLORED People ain't helping! 😂
(DIR) Post #A635fCWGTrGKYeEiES by tfmonkey@paypig.org
2021-04-08T21:24:36Z
1 likes, 2 repeats
@TheMadPirate @bigmattoidchimpin When someone has cancer, the choice isn't between the life of the patient and the life of the cancer. If the cancer "wins", the cancer also dies along with the patient.The only rational choice is to cut the cancer out and save the patient's life.When the welfare state goes bankrupt and we get Venezuelan-style hyperinflation, all the people you have empathy for will die anyway, along with millions more.It's not about lack of empathy, but realism.
(DIR) Post #A635iM0TfCIMqos5tg by bigmattoidchimpin@degenerates.fail
2021-04-08T21:25:11.411Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@tfmonkey@paypig.org Oy vey, that rapid response was N/A. The OP and reply were clearly about semantics and fantasy taxonomy, not vidya or fantasy public policy. I don't think you actually read or understood the post in light of the response, but that's understandable given the nature of my (surely unusual) post. If I were overthinking anything, I wouldn't have taken that risk in the first place. 😆
(DIR) Post #A6366Cb6IZnAcPNDBB by tfmonkey@paypig.org
2021-04-08T21:29:29Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@bigmattoidchimpin you're right. I only read the first part of your post and skimmed the rest.I'll see myself out.
(DIR) Post #A636V8yGuyvuby6Xw0 by mystik@midnightride.rs
2021-04-08T21:34:00.172087Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@tfmonkey @TheMadPirate @bigmattoidchimpin The cancer is the patient. Not the best example? I mean, what you really need to cure a cancer patient is alkaline blood, strong immune system, and let the organism eliminate all the debris by itself.Translating that to harmful groups of people... same thing -- a natural approach is always better. If everyone has to work hard, educate themselves hard, and stick to (common sense) laws... then the negative elements will out themselves pretty soon.
(DIR) Post #A637GjoNlPSGTrAoim by bigmattoidchimpin@degenerates.fail
2021-04-08T21:42:36.367Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Heh, I originally referred to that issue in that post, but it was too long so I think I only kept the throwaway reference to our intergenerational updates to the commonly accepted referent for black Americans. Like you, I do not recall any good rationale or explanation for why "colored" became offensive in whatever 'new age' or generation that decided to discard it. I also don't understand why "Negro" became offensive (aside from its association with and similarity to "nigger"). At the end of the day, it's just a color and, furthermore, the great irony here is that Southern 'aristocrats' and plantation elites embraced terms like "Negro" and "colored" to not just be polite but even to further what honestly looked like a proto- form of what we'd refer today as "virtue signaling" (and the attributed reasoning underlying the adoption of those terms was sufficiently class-conscious to be equated to contemporary "virtue signaling"). Actually, that phenomenon is even reflected in "Gone With the Wind" (the book, at least). Basically, the use of the term "nigger" was associated with lower-class whites AND 'lower-class" black slaves (who used it for self-reference),
(DIR) Post #A63GLd3dCZ1mZJiHBY by TooDamnOld@degenerates.fail
2021-04-08T23:06:07.171Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
That is true, and there's been so much of this in the past. I think a lot of it might be attributed to blacks not having a clear identity themselves, as well as a lot of whites trying to figure out how to fit them in to society. I've long thought of one group as ABMs, Angry Black Men. Usually young, sometimes educated and at least semi-successful, usually not, but always determined to not let Whitey tell them anything! It's like we could warn them to not walk off a cliff, and they would do it just to show us we can't tell them what to do. A lot of their identity is basically "I'm not what white people are", but that just leaves them with none of their own, it's always a negative. People like that are usually really touchy about small things most people wouldn't even worry about, so as soon as one name is accepted, they come up with another just to challenge everyone. As for the whites trying to accommodate all this, it's impossible, a losing game, and the more we try, the more we feed the demands.