Post A3EgedLwDCIO5DnhuS by nicebit@bitcoinhackers.org
(DIR) More posts by nicebit@bitcoinhackers.org
(DIR) Post #A3EZAIRAiBYuqdpseW by drbitcoinmd@bitcoinhackers.org
2021-01-14T16:37:18Z
1 likes, 1 repeats
.@nvkI urge you to reconsider this or at least give it some time and work with us to come up with some type of plan to work around this. Not sure how feasible it is to pass control to someone else or if we can help in any way.I believe that the community is benefiting greatly from having this as a resource and it would be incredibly disappointing to waste this opportunity.If you have any ideas, I'm all ears.
(DIR) Post #A3EZAJ6eDyjsvHF0Ii by nvk@bitcoinhackers.org
2021-01-14T16:39:02Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@drbitcoinmd give time
(DIR) Post #A3EZTOi7bydHo4s8S8 by drbitcoinmd@bitcoinhackers.org
2021-01-14T16:42:28Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@nvk don't pay too much attention to the FUDsters. You can't maintain 100% approval once you pass a certain threshold of users. I think the ground rules are extremely clear and obvious. If people don't like it or actively work against it, they should be banned. They can then choose to run their own instance.I'm fairly certain most of us are ok with that and don't see it as a problem.
(DIR) Post #A3Eg8BfBcqCIwHKfZo by nicebit@bitcoinhackers.org
2021-01-14T17:57:05Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@nvk @drbitcoinmd Let me run it -- you back it up, I'll restore on my server, we transfer the domain and that's it, I'll take care of it. It doesn't take too much server resources, does it? What sort of instance are you running it on?Don't just kill it, is a good thing!
(DIR) Post #A3EgVw0LUnl9KAYLvE by nvk@bitcoinhackers.org
2021-01-14T18:01:22Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@nicebit @drbitcoinmd centralization will just keep happening.
(DIR) Post #A3EgedLwDCIO5DnhuS by nicebit@bitcoinhackers.org
2021-01-14T18:02:57Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@nvk @drbitcoinmd I don't mind a little centralized mastodon for bitcoin maxis -- what bitcoinhackers.org is de facto. Nothing wrong with it in my opinion.