Post A2RDwHdPbGf6oFmYcK by erinzer04@mastodon.technology
 (DIR) More posts by erinzer04@mastodon.technology
 (DIR) Post #A2RDnK1zJxxHdT0KjQ by lain@lain.com
       2020-12-21T21:18:44.712964Z
       
       9 likes, 3 repeats
       
       
       
 (DIR) Post #A2RDwHdPbGf6oFmYcK by erinzer04@mastodon.technology
       2020-12-21T21:19:34Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @lain He does have a point though 😳
       
 (DIR) Post #A2RDwHtMdxQFbjFITw by lain@lain.com
       2020-12-21T21:20:21.216323Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @erinzer04 he isn't wrong
       
 (DIR) Post #A2RJF0zmBjaKTbzhZI by TheMadPirate@freespeechextremist.com
       2020-12-21T22:19:47.462260Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @lain Which is a problem for socialism.I mean, what if a free market capitalist wins the elections ? Such guy on the "wrong side of history" will implement an economic plan that will lead to social inequality i.e. natural order !!!No socialist will a conscience can allow that to happen !!!
       
 (DIR) Post #A2RJLhy1KjlZULMewr by lain@lain.com
       2020-12-21T22:20:56.472499Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @TheMadPirate what do you mean, socialist countries had much higher social inequality than any capitalist state. are you saying socialism is the natural order?
       
 (DIR) Post #A2ROXrT8KbGECgX1tI by TheMadPirate@freespeechextremist.com
       2020-12-21T23:19:13.194910Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @lain I was being facetious. My point is that socialist countries can't allow free election because it would create the possibility of getting into power someone that would dismantle the control-freak hyper-regulatory system that is socialism. Of course the excuse socialist will give is that allowing so (i.e. free elections ) can or will "create social inequality".