Post 9pzMPpioebitLPgk3k by sneak@s.sneak.berlin
 (DIR) More posts by sneak@s.sneak.berlin
 (DIR) Post #9pxNeY1SS9ueQt4IyW by vantablack@cybre.space
       2019-12-14T12:52:52Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       marxism is fake communismanarchist communism is real communismbecause guess which one is more likely to lead to a classless, stateless, moneyless society?
       
 (DIR) Post #9pxNeYrDLjJT1PHdeC by vantablack@cybre.space
       2019-12-14T13:07:30Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       marxism is like "let's shoot ourselves in the foot by becoming the state instead of abolishing it, directly in conflict with our supposed end goal of a communist society"i'm sorry but how the fuck does that make any sense
       
 (DIR) Post #9pxNeZUuy74X0XrLX6 by vantablack@cybre.space
       2019-12-14T13:08:05Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       i am incredibly high and incredibly drunk
       
 (DIR) Post #9pxNeaQLWb0dsejD2u by vantablack@cybre.space
       2019-12-14T13:10:57Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       states don't just "wither away"they must be dismantled
       
 (DIR) Post #9pxNeb09NTeJfhTnqy by vantablack@cybre.space
       2019-12-14T13:11:35Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       i am so happy people are avoiding this thread
       
 (DIR) Post #9pxNebfyrx6rlR3D3Q by sneak@s.sneak.berlin
       2019-12-14T13:22:38Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @vantablack i dont think you will be able to eliminate money under anarchism, the only way you will take personal property from some is by harming them; your anarchism is immoral and unethical if you need to use violence to enforce it, you’re just a dictatorship then
       
 (DIR) Post #9pxXEPck3VwSOggTLc by radikalgrafitio@sunbeam.city
       2019-12-14T15:09:57Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @sneak @vantablack possessions are not propertyproperty requires force to sustain, it requires a statethere is nothing unanarchist about using violence
       
 (DIR) Post #9pxlYy8Qqunya7Cf9U by sneak@s.sneak.berlin
       2019-12-14T17:50:34Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @radikalgrafitio @vantablack violence is deplorable and amoral and unethical. using violent coercion and claiming it’s legitimate just means you’ve recreated a state.
       
 (DIR) Post #9pxqzd25ux6givlpfk by radikalgrafitio@sunbeam.city
       2019-12-14T18:47:20Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @sneak @vantablack thats not what a state is, and using violence against fascism, in defence of freedom etc is extremely good, and has a long history in anarchism
       
 (DIR) Post #9pzMPpioebitLPgk3k by sneak@s.sneak.berlin
       2019-12-15T12:18:12Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @radikalgrafitio @vantablack fascism isn’t an act, it is an ideology, and you cannot use violence against fascism any more than you can use violence against any other idea or set of ideas. you can use violence against people who commit violent acts in defense; initiating violence against people for their thoughts is unconscionable.