Post 9oyEEMCcTOoIPfZBOi by AdvManoj@mstdn.social
 (DIR) More posts by AdvManoj@mstdn.social
 (DIR) Post #9oxopwY7hZTr2yt1hA by dearthofsid@mastodon.social
       2019-11-14T07:47:39Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       If the 2018 ruling stays, Pinarayi Vijayan govt is duty bound to facilitate women entry in the upcoming #Sabarimala season. The right wing (BJP, Congress & others) will concoct another session of violent drama to milk the situation. Why can't the SC stay the 2018 ruling if it's "confused" about the decision? Shouldn't the judiciary have the basic responsibility support the executive maintaining the law and order?#SabarimalaVerdict
       
 (DIR) Post #9oyEELKNj3QPhSBrrE by Iwalkalone@mastodon.social
       2019-11-14T08:27:10Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @dearthofsid Common sense dictates that till the 2018 ruling is stayed, that ruling remains, as it is. Here it has been forwarded to a 7 member bench for "further introspection". Correct me if I am wrong.#sabarimala @AdvManoj @thecuriouself
       
 (DIR) Post #9oyEELt7dtDLRCRc0W by dearthofsid@mastodon.social
       2019-11-14T08:32:21Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Iwalkalone Yes, that's what I'm thinking. The lack of clarity seems very intentional so as to create a volatile environment.@AdvManoj @thecuriouself
       
 (DIR) Post #9oyEEMCcTOoIPfZBOi by AdvManoj@mstdn.social
       2019-11-15T01:19:11Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @dearthofsid @Iwalkalone @thecuriouself Yes. No disturbance to the ruling only distraction has been created. As if it's government's handiwork.