Post 9ouTu1Mh3fted4lPXs by CZubair@mastodon.social
 (DIR) More posts by CZubair@mastodon.social
 (DIR) Post #9ouTt6Miyt3LqfL8BE by CZubair@mastodon.social
       2019-11-13T05:47:37Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Jay_Ambadi writes: ""We must firmly reject any attempt to lead the court to interpret religious doctrine in an absolute and extreme form and question the faith of worshippers. Nothingwould be as destructive of the values underlying Article 25 of the Constitution."- Supreme Court
       
 (DIR) Post #9ouTt6YmG4h6S2yky0 by CZubair@mastodon.social
       2019-11-13T05:49:58Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @Jay_Ambadi Halfway through, so far the most interesting part of the Ayodhya judgement is how the court demolished the claims of Nirmohi Akhara and the evidence and witnesses presented by them.
       
 (DIR) Post #9ouTu1Mh3fted4lPXs by CZubair@mastodon.social
       2019-11-13T05:49:42Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @Jay_Ambadi Reached page 357 of 1045 of the Ayodhya Judgement. Everything (including every evidence) discussed so far supports only the case of Masjid. This is like a suspense thriller now. I don't want to miss any clue, though I want to see how the final outcome was arrived at!🙄