Post 9kFYulXnrUrfPeeDC4 by al@mamot.fr
 (DIR) More posts by al@mamot.fr
 (DIR) Post #9kFWvpYIFKOiDyFyl6 by kaniini@pleroma.site
       2019-06-26T20:18:43.763343Z
       
       0 likes, 2 repeats
       
       it has been observed a few times that litepub collides with an indieweb application also called litepub.so, we are thinking about renaming the WG.someone suggested that we call it SocialPub.  is that good or not?
       
 (DIR) Post #9kFYulXnrUrfPeeDC4 by al@mamot.fr
       2019-06-26T20:39:43Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @kaniini When u mean working group, you mean "informal commitee" or is there anything like W3C or IETF going on ?Also, if you were not trolling.Light is cool. Minimal, efficient, frugal. Social is vague.
       
 (DIR) Post #9kFYum91d6dfH63wDA by kaniini@pleroma.site
       2019-06-26T20:41:01.159866Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @al Litepub is presently an informal committee.  it is meant to be to ActivityPub what WHATWG was until recently to HTML.
       
 (DIR) Post #9kFZLWYBiTvAjGaRcW by murabito@fedi.absturztau.be
       2019-06-26T20:45:53.034937Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @kaniini @al wish there were more options than this and not this. cos i don't know tbh. i like the idea though.