Post 9iaKF5XD7eIZVtymFk by jtl@mastodon.social
 (DIR) More posts by jtl@mastodon.social
 (DIR) Post #9ia7T9s6UmeNcA8A1w by kaniini@pleroma.site
       2019-05-07T22:57:56.463596Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       I mean I'm not convinced Purism will stop spam from their instance much less moderate it in line with what the CDA requires (which is not much).  I'm not looking for ideological purity here, just for them to help the rest of the admin community also comply with their own obligations under the CDA (or equivalent law).
       
 (DIR) Post #9iaKF5XD7eIZVtymFk by jtl@mastodon.social
       2019-05-08T01:20:05Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @kaniini Communications Decency ActAlso OOTL: What's wrong with librem.one/Purism's Mastodon instance?
       
 (DIR) Post #9iaKF5lkFbvOEymNuK by kaniini@pleroma.site
       2019-05-08T01:21:18.855076Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @jtl mainly, they have disabled the public and federated timelines, so they have no visibility of what is going in or out of the instance.