Post 9ff7vXrm3lWXjDfdoW by GardenOfForkingPaths@hostux.social
 (DIR) More posts by GardenOfForkingPaths@hostux.social
 (DIR) Post #9ff7vXrm3lWXjDfdoW by GardenOfForkingPaths@hostux.social
       2019-02-09T15:19:59Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       'After investigation of their most recent reviews, we found that in every review this reviewer requested an average of 35 citations be added, approximately 90% of which were to their own papers and the remainder to papers that both cited them extensively and mentioned them by name in the title. The reviewer’s phrasing strongly suggested that inclusion of these citations would influence their recommendation to the editor to accept or reject the paper.'https://retractionwatch.com/2019/02/07/the-case-of-the-reviewer-who-said-cite-me-or-i-wont-recommend-acceptance-of-your-work/