Post 762616 by djsumdog@hitchhiker.social
 (DIR) More posts by djsumdog@hitchhiker.social
 (DIR) Post #759850 by wowaname@anime.website
       2018-10-25T13:07:34.777473Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       why cant gmail set a stronger spf rule
       
 (DIR) Post #762186 by wowaname@anime.website
       2018-10-25T16:06:00.673655Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       _spf.google.com.        300     IN      TXT     "v=spf1 include:_netblocks.google.com include:_netblocks2.google.com include:_netblocks3.google.com ~all"that ~all part is stupid
       
 (DIR) Post #762616 by djsumdog@hitchhiker.social
       2018-10-25T16:16:21Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wowaname Google doesn't even use/respect SPF records internally.
       
 (DIR) Post #763049 by yesnaught@sink.big.mt
       2018-10-25T16:45:22.358190Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wowaname Apparently no email server gives a shit about the difference between ~all and -all, I saw ~all recommended somewhere recently
       
 (DIR) Post #763051 by wowaname@anime.website
       2018-10-25T17:11:34.246922Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @yesnaught i saw perhaps the same article just today when looking up this stuff