Post 661555 by h3artbl33d@bsd.network
 (DIR) More posts by h3artbl33d@bsd.network
 (DIR) Post #660724 by neauoire@sunbeam.city
       2018-10-20T19:04:38Z
       
       1 likes, 3 repeats
       
       The Key Principles of the IndieWeb.— Own your data, content, metadata and your identity.— Publish data for humans first, machines second.— Scratch Your Own Itches. Make tools, templates, etc. for yourself first.— Use what you make! — Document your stuff. — Open source your stuff! — UX and design is more important than protocols, formats, and data models.— Build platform agnostic platforms. — Longevity. Build for the long web. — Plurality. — Have fun.https://indieweb.org/principles
       
 (DIR) Post #661555 by h3artbl33d@bsd.network
       2018-10-20T20:09:45Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @neauoire Although I very much like the initiative, I have to disagree that UX and design is ought to be more important than protocols, formats, etc. Personally, I think it is the other way around; form follows function. More than often, that exact principe is the foundation of open source. But hey, just my two cents.
       
 (DIR) Post #661590 by neauoire@sunbeam.city
       2018-10-20T20:13:29Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @h3artbl33d Reading through their guidelines, it seems like they work like this: Prototype first, and implement function later. Their approach to dogfood is, create content and a front-end first, build managerial tools later, based and around that content.
       
 (DIR) Post #661772 by h3artbl33d@bsd.network
       2018-10-20T20:31:33Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @neauoire Might be dependent on the phrasing I guess. Most software is developed to satisfy a need, to achieve a certain goal. From that perspective, I'd say the architecture comes first, function second and user interface third and last.
       
 (DIR) Post #661798 by neauoire@sunbeam.city
       2018-10-20T20:34:43Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @h3artbl33d Yeah, that's the thing right. I'm sort of defending IndieWeb's approach even tho it's not personally how I am doing things now. But their thinking is that the specs will adapt to the person's designs(xml classes), and the designs do not have to adapt to their specs(json-ld).
       
 (DIR) Post #662004 by h3artbl33d@bsd.network
       2018-10-20T20:58:06Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @neauoire Interesting and valid point! Didn't think about it in that way. Spending too much time with web hipsters can mess with one's mind.
       
 (DIR) Post #672352 by saxnot@chaos.social
       2018-10-21T11:48:11Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @neauoire quoteBuild platform agnostic platformsend quote
       
 (DIR) Post #673977 by karthik@fosstodon.org
       2018-10-21T13:54:21Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @neauoireAre you talking abt something like Zeronet
       
 (DIR) Post #674116 by brandon@fosstodon.org
       2018-10-21T14:03:16Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @neauoire I love how they say ux and design is more important than protocols and what not, but then say builds for the long webSeems kind of oxymoronic
       
 (DIR) Post #675198 by fallenhitokiri@infosec.exchange
       2018-10-21T15:23:56Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @neauoire Especially the last point resonates with me. But this seems like a pretty good list for outside work projects