Post 466898 by uranther@cybre.space
 (DIR) More posts by uranther@cybre.space
 (DIR) Post #453369 by uranther@cybre.space
       2018-10-09T21:29:49Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       I realized that #Hugo's templating engine is powerful enough to make a rudimentary #wiki :thinkhappy: - #Go templates- #TOML configuration (data representation)- #Markdown or HTML#exocortex #KnowledgeBase
       
 (DIR) Post #456133 by jrc03c@sunbeam.city
       2018-10-10T00:19:46Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @uranther I haven't tried Hugo yet. Do you have any idea how it compares to Jekyll?
       
 (DIR) Post #456491 by uranther@cybre.space
       2018-10-10T00:50:07Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @jrc03c I've used both, though not extensively. #Hakyll, too.It seems to me that #Hugo learned from #Jekyll's design, translating that to a cleaner #Go-based engine that is more general-purpose than (what was originally intended) for #blogging.I like that Hugo is stable and fast and stays out of your way, whereas Jekyll was real finicky with what #Ruby version you use.
       
 (DIR) Post #456737 by jrc03c@sunbeam.city
       2018-10-10T01:06:00Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @uranther Cool. Good to know. I'd also heard of people having really long build times with Jekyll, but I've never had problems with that or with Ruby versions.
       
 (DIR) Post #466140 by xvw@sunbeam.city
       2018-10-10T15:39:46Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @uranther you should give a try to hakyll!
       
 (DIR) Post #466898 by uranther@cybre.space
       2018-10-10T16:15:50Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @xvw I've tried it in the past. :blobshrug: