Post 2375532 by 402PaymentRequired@bitcoinhackers.org
 (DIR) More posts by 402PaymentRequired@bitcoinhackers.org
 (DIR) Post #2375532 by 402PaymentRequired@bitcoinhackers.org
       2018-12-28T19:39:52Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Coinkite article on wallet.fail:https://blog.coinkite.com/other-wallet-fail/
       
 (DIR) Post #2376865 by TallTim@bitcoinhackers.org
       2018-12-28T20:29:10Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @402PaymentRequired Here's the wallet.fail video in its own frame, which is helpful if you want to resize it to an arbitrary browser window instead of viewing it fullscreen. https://media.ccc.de/v/35c3-9563-wallet_fail/oembed
       
 (DIR) Post #2396126 by liberliver@mastodon.social
       2018-12-29T10:55:01Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @402PaymentRequired so the question remains: what is better for security, an ability to generate keys using additional passphrase or sophisticated design and PIN protection. As far as I know, Coldcard does not allow to use passphrase.
       
 (DIR) Post #2396282 by 402PaymentRequired@bitcoinhackers.org
       2018-12-29T11:05:56Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @liberliver An individual might worry about 2 characteristics that his/her device  must have ✅ ✅ Some other individual perhaps has a longer list of checkboxes ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅  ... or none at all.IMO adjectives like better/worse (I'm guilty of this as well) are totally a function of the education of the user and of the compromises you make when converging on a solution. In other words... It's "better/worse" for what exactly?Know your variables, I guess...