Post 1787614 by orekix@pl.smuglo.li
 (DIR) More posts by orekix@pl.smuglo.li
 (DIR) Post #1787534 by freon@letsalllovela.in
       2018-12-07T00:42:42.862901Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       firefox is, afaik, now the only non-webkit (desktop?) browser. period! :MonkaS:
       
 (DIR) Post #1787553 by jeff@social.i2p.rocks
       2018-12-07T00:43:34.236598Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @freon the w3c browser is an abomination
       
 (DIR) Post #1787561 by freon@letsalllovela.in
       2018-12-07T00:43:55.594262Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       firefox *and it's derivatives
       
 (DIR) Post #1787577 by orekix@pl.smuglo.li
       2018-12-07T00:44:43.133586Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @freon netsurf?
       
 (DIR) Post #1787599 by freon@letsalllovela.in
       2018-12-07T00:45:57.866527Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @orekix oof, i knew I was forgetting oneactually tried running that once on a PIII laptop with FreeBSD too...
       
 (DIR) Post #1787614 by orekix@pl.smuglo.li
       2018-12-07T00:46:45.980669Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @freon I've only used it to browse some debian documentation while on gparted live tbh
       
 (DIR) Post #1787639 by freon@letsalllovela.in
       2018-12-07T00:47:53.004430Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @jeff amaya? last updated in 2012...
       
 (DIR) Post #1790611 by anish@vis.social
       2018-12-07T02:39:48Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @freon uhh, maybe "modern browser" or "graphical browser" is more accurate. lynx and w3m can still browse the web! also most firefox forks use Firefox's engine. (this may be overly pedantic because i thought for sure some linux broswer like surf or luakit *must* be using something other than webkit, but they all use webkit!! and now i feel compelled to respond, my apologies)
       
 (DIR) Post #1790613 by freon@letsalllovela.in
       2018-12-07T03:26:39.716511Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @anish right!