Post 132997 by Sparky@elekk.xyz
 (DIR) More posts by Sparky@elekk.xyz
 (DIR) Post #131517 by noelle@elekk.xyz
       2018-09-22T03:09:32Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Quick straw poll: Would you be more likely to spell out the words in content warnings (e.g. "mental health" instead of "mh", "US politics" instead of "uspol") if content warnings didn't count against the character limit for the toot they're attached to?https://www.strawpoll.me/16503664
       
 (DIR) Post #131652 by TheShyIon@elekk.xyz
       2018-09-22T03:30:28Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @noelle I didn't realize they /did/ count against the limit. I am oblivious, whoops. o_o
       
 (DIR) Post #132547 by Archbeth@elekk.xyz
       2018-09-22T06:02:15Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @noelle I'd use abbreviations b/c typing on a screen keyboard on my phone is a nuisance. Also, Tootdon has poor UI when it comes to long CWs. Very. Poor. UI.
       
 (DIR) Post #132997 by Sparky@elekk.xyz
       2018-09-22T07:17:03Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @noelleIn my opinion, Content Warnings should never use abbreviations, even if the poster struggles with the character limit. It provides a better service for the people that seriously need CWs.That being said, I support CWs not counting towards the total character limit.
       
 (DIR) Post #133743 by irina@tabletop.social
       2018-09-22T08:54:26Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @noelle Depends completely on the culture of the instance I'm on at the moment. (Also, there's so much space for toots that a couple more characters won't make a big dent in it)
       
 (DIR) Post #134858 by archadia@tootplanet.space
       2018-09-22T10:54:01Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @noelle absolutely