Post B2DhsfDMAUABst6v7g by mcc@mastodon.social
 (DIR) More posts by mcc@mastodon.social
 (DIR) Post #B2DhsfDMAUABst6v7g by mcc@mastodon.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       RE: https://wandering.shop/@xgranade/115883972029010549There should be a list documenting which open source projects are making use of "AI" code generation (eg: code stolen from other open source projects without following the licenses), and that list should track the last clean no-"AI" commit for future forks.This is because I want to not run "AI"-generated code on my computer. If you disagree with this, you're saying I have no right to keep slopware off my computer, and in fact information must be hidden from me to prevent me from avoiding it.
       
 (DIR) Post #B2Dhsil8zJyMsXwRhg by mcc@mastodon.social
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       I'll go further: If your code makes use of "AI" code generators, you shouldn't be describing it as "open source". There are source-available game mods of Mario 64 and Ocarina of Time based on code stolen from Nintendo by hackers. These aren't really "open source".OSS/Libre/Free Software is a project to build a commons based on consensual collaboration. You can't claim those labels when your project has, via "AI" scraping, contributors who are unknown, uncredited, and unconsenting.
       
 (DIR) Post #B2FB1bmpNF85giHNIG by burnoutqueen@todon.nl
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mcc I think it's vastly insulting to call the people who tirelessly reverse engineered Mario 64 using Ghidra by hand "thieves" in the same breath as you criticize slopware.