Post Ao7Dba6dIDJeKgpcYa by dvdp@mstdn.social
(DIR) More posts by dvdp@mstdn.social
(DIR) Post #Ao6G7dFDAJZC5DILR2 by hojomo@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed Is it where we are all going? If so, yes, or Federate with Open Vibe and take their lead?
(DIR) Post #Ao6GIHOwiXVvWWvREu by martijn@ieji.de
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup no, do 1 thing and do 1 thing good đ
also bridges exist for those who really want to, right @pixelfed
(DIR) Post #Ao6GUvAWglooKqCzbs by partizan@twiukraine.com
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed I don't know.If someone asked that question about Mastodon, or even better - ActivityPub in general - I would definitely say yes.Probably, even Mastodon should not do it by itself, it should be integrated somewhere on the level of the protocol, and not the platform itself.
(DIR) Post #Ao6GcTLM1iYcLwsFSi by gamey@chaos.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed I think it's a bad idea, you could implement the bridge negatively to make is easier for Pixelfed users to discover it and opt in but I am against native Bluesky support in general. Their protocol gives them full control rather than allowing for actually decentralization and we shouldn't embrace that!
(DIR) Post #Ao6HV2Bkgnzo3pOqfo by zakarisz@mastodon.online
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansupYes
(DIR) Post #Ao6Hu6wy7h7m4HRV1E by julian@fietkau.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup I've seen conceptual talk of combined ActivityPub servers and AT PDSes. For decentralization, that certainly makes more sense than routing everything through a single bridge. The idea seems worth exploring.It does have lots of caveats though: posts published to Bluesky cannot be edited and are always fully public, the data model (e.g. 300 chars max) is strict, and there may still be restrictions on the number of accounts per PDS. So check your assumptions carefully.
(DIR) Post #Ao6IFZR5PPTiUplKc4 by GuillaumeRossolini@infosec.exchange
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed disabled by default, with instance- and account-level controls? Sure
(DIR) Post #Ao6J3OMcqeL8dWQt1M by patrick@o0o.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed No, Pixelfed should stay with Frdiverse. AtProto is the delusion of decentralized network; itâs just outsourced data center.
(DIR) Post #Ao6J7S60ukmnMybB7A by almasfarah@vivaldi.net
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed I see so many digital artists in X have been migrating to Bluesky, so my answer is yes. For the sake of artwork exposure & promotion, I think Bluesky bridge is a good feature.Many people seems don't like Bluesky bridge (based this post reply), so I guess make this feature optional is a good decision.
(DIR) Post #Ao6JhYnfSxUAaSEds0 by indubitablyodin@sfba.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed Overall it strikes me as a good thing that doesnât particularly harm PixelFed users and could dramatically expand their community reach. Is Bluesky ripe with problematic potential? Sure! But people who go there might benefit from seeing a window into a larger federated Internet. đ¤ˇââď¸
(DIR) Post #Ao6K1sWtp0k5ZK52fI by HolyCrap@troet.cafe
0 likes, 0 repeats
No.@dansup @pixelfed
(DIR) Post #Ao6KZ9YfWyxLwDm5L6 by Dragonholley@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed YES! there should be an option, but I'm tired of people being pissy about this! Threads and Tumblr are far worse. Fediverse won't grow, if they keep up with this damn elitist attitude!
(DIR) Post #Ao6NWUC0ehu4vdazei by ame@breta.moe
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed Definitely yes, more user options are always good
(DIR) Post #Ao6OL5z4QG68cDfy9Q by SherlockHawk@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed Having a bridge between two protocols sounds good, we need less wall gardens for a true decentralized internet.
(DIR) Post #Ao6PENbWc27bBt1ZNQ by pixelcode@social.tchncs.de
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup Yes, this would significantly promote @pixelfed and open the door for mass adoption by âregular peopleâ who left Twitter for Bluesky and who are open to an integrated Instagram-like photo-sharing platform. This would casually introduce those Bluesky-first users to the Fediverse too.
(DIR) Post #Ao6Qc8opKt1wEr8lnM by amazing_mrhunsaker@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed for photos sure. The fear is that the pressure will be to nudge ever closer to instagram+threads intermingling. Personally I kind of like having multiple separate social feeds.
(DIR) Post #Ao6Rr8K3Yz2mztSbdA by maverick604@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed Seriously f*ch all these VC-funded social media plays. Thatâs exactly what we are all escaping, isnât it? No to Bluesky. No to Threads. Just NO.If every app bends over backwards to support Bluesky, whatâs their incentive to federate? Which they probably will never do anyway.
(DIR) Post #Ao6SwpnxQNkJG0jFQW by jamatex@mastodon.world
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed YES.
(DIR) Post #Ao6TNyoA3guz00lfu4 by Madagascar_Sky@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed I read that implementing AtProto would be super expensive and currently Bluesky holds the monopoly on being an app on AtProto.
(DIR) Post #Ao6b8xqk8f6FJgKJcW by clot27@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed would make things unnecessarily complex, as bsky wont show apub posts anyway
(DIR) Post #Ao6hSVxs7jB0LiMn5M by QueenAdrian@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed No, BlueSky is a fucking plague, keep them as far away from us as is reasonably possible.
(DIR) Post #Ao6opQsNuMNouIfv5E by LT14GJC@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup Yes!
(DIR) Post #Ao6p4beQ87L4fUNYSe by Sascha@bonn.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed In my opinion: No. Save your precious time for the essentials. Bluesky is maybe a hype but will disappear on the longterm. The Fediverse is here to stay. And it is much more important to get an Instagram/Tiktok alternative into broader usage.
(DIR) Post #Ao6p5H5o3CbfCIVVL6 by LT14GJC@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup Would also suggest getting Pixelfed/Loops accounts on Bluesky/Threads. Bluesky seemed to get loads of signups by having an account on Threads showing people what's available on Bluesky.
(DIR) Post #Ao6pPWXWKRTStg7rH6 by chriswood@mastodon.design
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed Nah. Better to save your effort for other things integrate with a bridge when one is mature and stable enough (e.g BridgyFed).
(DIR) Post #Ao749BWQCeFeOIHLdY by Ultimoore@mast.linuxgamecast.com
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed I mean it would be a great way to get more people on Pixelfed. I personally don't trust that platform. But my personal "feelings" don't align with what should be done to get more users. If you can find a way to show artists that the platform is great for sharing art and keeping them safe from people stealing their art for Ai projects but also making it easy for them to create content on the platform I think it will be a win in my mind.
(DIR) Post #Ao75k6Q6EcJdEhUOky by taketwo@social.tchncs.de
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup yes
(DIR) Post #Ao7Dba6dIDJeKgpcYa by dvdp@mstdn.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed Get Damus, itâs a Nostr protocol like Blueskyâs AT protocol.
(DIR) Post #Ao7ICioqGCdZt3TXmq by samir@m.fedica.com
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed yes
(DIR) Post #Ao7iEutUvy98izMPdA by mntyfrsh@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed One vote for yes from me! Or if not, at least getting integration with @bsky.brid.gy to work in Pixelfed like it does with Mastodon.
(DIR) Post #Ao83fHtq7XhEdpw6xU by sashank@mastodon.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@dansup @pixelfed Yes, I'm working on getting all of these feeds on one app as it is.