Post Amho7b1pteVCtsgCLA by bragefuglseth@fosstodon.org
 (DIR) More posts by bragefuglseth@fosstodon.org
 (DIR) Post #Amho7b1pteVCtsgCLA by bragefuglseth@fosstodon.org
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       Currently on a metainfo crusade throughout the GNOME ecosystem to fix some quirks and make apps look their best on apps.gnome.org, and I just found out that putting stuff *below* the <releases> section of app metainfo files is apparently a totally normal thing to do!? We could really use some more people going through this stuff 🤨
       
 (DIR) Post #Amho7bqsprKrSCYxuK by bragefuglseth@fosstodon.org
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       Context for non-developers: the metainfo file is a document where apps provide information for app stores, e.g. the app name, developer name, description, icon, screenshot URLs, supported screen sizes, etc. The longest section of this document is usually the one containing release notes , so I've always thought that everyone put it last. However, I've had to scroll past years of releases to get to basic info such as website URLs and age ratings for some apps, even ones in GNOME's core set.