> I think I could well upset alot of you here but I feal I have to
> say this.
> Tacking Escher as a starting piont for defining a VR world
> is wrong here are two resons why.
>
> (1) Its odd to have any Statick 2D image as a starting pont for creating
> some form of CRITEC of a 4DVR world.
What on EARTH gives you this opinion?
Surely that is an arbitrary standpoint.
Are you concerned that 2D images in some way contain less "substance" and
so you have to do a fair amount of synthesis to build from them?
Remember context! You already _know_ what it is you are supposed to be
looking at.
>
> (2) The HIGH ART wating of interlchal debat surounding pinting
> as a clasical art form would bog dowen any NEW defanishon
> of Cencerey exsperounces. e.g. the total exseptencer of the gallary
> and museum platformes for SHOWING art works. this can be seen
> by the prolifarashon of Virtual Gallerys on the INTERNET.
> Rarther than invent a NEW Ideal are cosepet the gallery is sipaly super
> inposed in to Cyberspace and BADLY.
>
Get a better editor. Either that or make your verbal puns more obvious
to slow-wits like me. I have NO idea what the hell you are on about.
>
> DISCLAIMER: I am DYSLEXIC sorry for any spelling or grammar mistakes
Oh!
Fair enough, but I still disagree with you.
I'll rejoin this thread a bit further down.
> _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
> ============================
>
> SEAN. E. VARNEY . VR-ART@
Jon Holdsworth
jon@alexia.access.net.au