Subj : Re: ping netmail - Does M To : G00R00 From : WKITTY42 Date : Thu Jan 31 2019 07:20 pm On 09/01/14, g00r00 said the following... g0> Ps> Does Mystic currently handle netmail addressed to "ping" to reply bac g0> Ps> to the sender a route path the netmail has taken thus far, and contin g0> Ps> sending on the original as expected? g0> g0> Let me make sure I understand exactly what you're asking for. http://ftsc.org/docs/fts-5001.005 ====== snip ====== Publication: FTS-5001 Revision: 5 Title: Nodelist flags and userflags Author: FTSC Members, Administrator and Honoured Guests Date: 2014-07-01 [...] Section 5.10. Robot Flags PING ---- Specified as exactly "PING" with no arguments. Nodes flying this flag will adhere to the following functionality: 1) PING-function: If a message destined to "PING" arrives at its final destination and this final destination flies the "PING"-flag, then the receiving node will bounce the message back to the original sender clearly quoting all the original via-lines. If a message destined to "PING" arrives at its final destination but this final destination does _not_ fly the "PING"-flag then the message may be deleted from the inbound-queue without further follow-up. 2) TRACE-function: If a message destined to "PING" arrives at a node which flies the PING-flag but is merely passing-through to another destination then the in-transit node will notify the sender of this occurrence and will forward the original mail unaltered towards its final destination. WARNING: the sender's name (in either direction) must *NEVER* be "PING". ====== snip ====== as for software that supports it, numerous netmail trackers recognize and respond to ping messages... OT-Track does, netmgr can be configured to, GIGO (FTN<->internet gateway package) can be configured to... there are others, as well... HTH --- Mystic BBS v1.10 A51 (Windows) * Origin: (46:1/132) þ Synchronet þ thePharcyde_ >> telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) .