Subj : Number of BBSes?
To   : Frank Vest
From : Rick Van Ruth
Date : Sun Jan 05 2003 11:27 am

G'Day Frank,

03 Jan 03 19:26, you wrote to me:

 RV>> Perhaps something is needed to denote BBS's in the nodelist, MO
 RV>> does not really seem to be doing the job. Yeah, I also have always
 RV>> run a BBS, without it I wouldn't bother being in any ftn.

 FV> <grin> As is so commonly argued.... The Fidonet Nodelist is a list of
 FV> connection information, not a BBS list. <<wink>>

Then maybe its time to change that. You have to remember way back that having
a BBS was taken for granted for most any node.

 FV> Let's not go into this too deep. I don't want another thread like in
 FV> FTSC_PUBLIC with David. :)  Not accusing you of doing such a thing.

Ahh but this is more towards future development and directions, FTSC_PUBLIC
should really only have discussion about current standards, and currently
submitted proposals. Not future development, the FTSC isn't responsible for
development :-)

Cheers,
                Rick

.... BREAKFAST.COM Halted... Cereal port not responding.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5 - Debian/GNU
 * Origin: Vampyre's Heaven BBS (3:640/954)

.