Subj : Re: And what prevents us from creating an echo conference of the same n
To   : Stas Mishchenkov
From : Wilfred van Velzen
Date : Fri Nov 20 2020 08:53 pm

Hi Stas,

On 2020-11-20 21:07:08, you wrote to me:

 WvV>> A new echomail area TELEGRAM. Or TELEGRAM.FIDONET would be a good
 WvV>> idea though, I think.

 SM> Ok. Let's do it!

 WvV>>  Or can a gated area have different names on the Telegram
 WvV>> and Fidonet side?

 SM> Yes. The name of the group now may be completely different from ECHOTAG.
 SM> Such groups even already exist.

 WvV>>  Than it can be TELEGRAM on the fidonet side and FidoNet
 WvV>> on the Telegram side. ;-)

 SM> Yes. It can be that way.

 SM> I really liked both of your ideas. We can create a FIDONET.TELEGRAM group
 SM> associated with TELEGRAM.FIDONET echo and/or link the FidoNet group with
 SM> the TELEGRAM echo. It is very important that they are international and it
 SM> is desirable to have one of these groups open, public.

Not to confuse people to much I think the names should be the same on both sides. So how about TELEGRAM.FIDONET, unless someone has a better idea?

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)

.