Subj : Re: when a practice does it better.
To   : Michiel van der Vlist
From : Dan Clough
Date : Tue Feb 25 2025 07:49 am

-=> Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Dan Clough <=-

 MK>> Nevermind "better", totally ignoring everything FTS-5003 has to
 MK>> say about anything it supposedly covers is the "best" idea.

 MvV>> If totally ignoring the FTSC is te "best" idea, why bother to
 MvV>> have an FTSC at all?

 DC> Since you're very "detail-oriented", I thought I'd point out that he
 DC> didn't say the FTSC should be ignored.  He said FTS-5003 should be
 DC> ignored.  Pretty big difference there, no?

 MvV> It is indeed not the same. I jumped two steps ahead. So let me help you
 MvV> by filling in the missing steps:

 MvV> 1) If totally ignoring FTS-5003 is the "best" idea, what is stopping us
 MvV> from totally ignoring any other FTSC standard that one does not agree
 MvV> with?

 MvV> 2) If totally ignoring any FTSC standard that one does not agree with
 MvV> is the "best", what stops us from totally ignoring anything that the
 MvV> FTSC does or produces?

 MvV> 3) if nothing stops us from totally ignoring the FTSC why bother to
 MvV> have an FTSC at all?

Sorry, debate doesn't work that way.  You can't just continually use 
"If... if... if..., then".

I'll counter your questions with something equally irrelevant:

If pigs had wings, could they fly?

 MvV> Hope this helps.

It didn't.  It just continued to illustrate your petty-ness.



.... I'd love to help you out.  Which way did you come in?
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.23-Linux
 * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:135/115)

.