Subj : type 2.2 pkt header
To   : Maurice Kinal
From : Rob Swindell
Date : Fri Apr 14 2023 11:41 am

  Re: type 2.2 pkt header
  By: Maurice Kinal to Rob Swindell on Thu Apr 13 2023 07:48 pm

 > Hey Rob!
 >
 >  RS> So *I* call FSC-48 compliant packets "Type 2+"
 >
 > Okay.
 >
 >  RS> and FSC-39 comliant packets as "Type 2e".
 >
 > That doesn't match any of the Types in the document in question.

Which document is that?

 >  RS> but *might* be just 2e compliant.
 >
 > Gotta love when that happens.
 >
 >  RS> http://wiki.synchro.net/ref:fidonet_packets
 >
 > How does that compare to "FSP-1042 draft 7"?

I think the differentiation I've done between FSC-39 and FSC-48 compliant packets is important, to me at least, and I don't think that's well covered in the FSP-1042 draft. I recall finding a hole/error in FSP-1042 draft when I was updating the SBBSecho type-2 packet parsing/generation logic and creating that wiki page, but I seem to have lost that detail to time. I'll keep doing comparisons between the docs and my code see if that'll jar it loose.
-- 
                                            digital man (rob)

This Is Spinal Tap quote #5:
Nigel Tufnel: Authorities said... best leave it... unsolved.
Norco, CA WX: 57.7øF, 69.0% humidity, 4 mph E wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

.