Subj : Re: 2023 FTSC Standing Member Election - Preliminary Results
To   : Michiel van der Vlist
From : Dan Clough
Date : Thu Mar 23 2023 07:33 am

-=> Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Andrew Leary <=-

 AL>> I have received your challenge to the preliminary results.  In
 AL>> reviewing historical precedent, ...

 WD> Historical precedent states that you can only challenge the way how
 WD> your own ballot was processed, not what happened to someone else's ...

 MvV> There is no such historical precedent. Ward is making it up for
 MvV> the occasion.

Yup.  I've asked him in a separate post to provide a citation to this 
imaginary precedent, and I know exactly how he's going to respond (it 
won't be with any actual reference/citation).

 WD> Meaning Michiel's objection ought to be rejected.

 MvV> Even if it could be demonstrated that such a hypothetical
 MvV> precedence exists and a decision made by the vote coordinator can
 MvV> only be challenged by a voter regarding his/her own vote, then by
 MvV> that same reasoning Ward's challenge is null and void as he is
 MvV> not a voter.

Game. Set. Match.

Case dismissed and closed.



.... All the easy problems have been solved.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
 * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)

.