Subj : Test Reply
To   : deon
From : Accession
Date : Fri Dec 22 2023 04:59 pm

Hello deon,

On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 18:27:28 +1100, you wrote:

 CH>>> If that is correct, then it took 7 hours 3 minutes 56 seconds to
 CH>>> get here.

 >> Is this happening because there is no TZUTC kludge? Or it is not
 >> taking UTC offsets into consideration? Did it *really* take 7+ hours
 >> to get there?

 d> Right, this message had no TZUTC kludge, and there is no way clrghouz
 d> knows which timezone the message came from. (The message went 2/148 ->
 d> 2/100 -> 3/100). This is why I have the phrases "it looks like you sent
 d> it..." and "If that is correct..."

 d> All times in the clrghouz test messages response are UTC, (it was
 d> actually received at 2023-12-22 06:35:56 local time).

I figured. I did notice there wasn't a TZUTC on the original message so I just wanted to ask how you were 'trying' to handle that.

Regards,
Nick

.... "Take my advice, I don't use it anyway."
---
 * Origin: _thePharcyde distribution system (Wisconsin) (21:1/200.0)

.