Subj : Test Reply
To   : Al
From : deon
Date : Tue Oct 10 2023 05:40 pm

  Re: Test Reply
  By: Al to deon on Mon Oct 09 2023 08:11 pm

 > > So it looks like your message made it into the past.
 >
 > It is the time it was posted here. TZUTC -7.
 >
 > > I'm guessing you dont include a TZUTC in your messages? (I havent
 > > checked). Just wondering if and how I can get the times more accurate.
 > > Clrghouz reports the time in utc, so not sure if 00:04:32 UTC is the same
 > > time for you (16:04:32)?
 >
 > No, the message was posted at 16:04:32 local time. Pacific Daylight Time.
 >
 > We are currently 7 hours behind UTC.

> Ú¿ÚÄ¿ÚÄ¿Ú¿ Your test was received here on 2023-10-09 23:05:05 and it looks
>  ³ ³ÄÙÀÄ¿ ³  like you sent it on 2023-10-10 00:04:32. If that is correct,
>  Á ÀÄÙÀÄÙ Á  then it took 59 minutes 26 seconds to get here.

Ahh, cool - so there must have been a kludge, for clrghouz to come up with 00:04:32. Given that this is an hour out then, it might be because of daylight saving time somehow (we went into summer time 2 weeks ago or so).

I think clrghouz correctly reported the UTC time (I'm guessint it was only 34 seconds to get here), so will need to think more on why my calculation of your time (in utc) is out by an hour.

Thanks



....ëîåï
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
 * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (21:2/116)

.