Subj : Re: Test Reply
To   : Accession
From : deon
Date : Mon Dec 01 2025 11:49 am

  Re: Re: Test Reply
  By: Accession to Clearing Houz on Sun Nov 30 2025 05:32 pm

Howdy,

 >  > PID: gettossed 0.1
 >  > TID: gettossed 0.1
 > This automated reply shows the PID and TID being the same. However, his
 > original message shows 'clrghouz' as the TID.
 >
 > Should clrghouz be modifying the tosser ID of the original message?

IMHO, yes.

The PID represent the source program that created the message - and should only be added by the source.

The TID represents the tosser that put the message into network, and should be changed by the tosser sending the message on.

(Well thats how I interpret it).
http://ftsc.org/docs/fsc-0046.005

So, the TID from the source to clrghouz (which clrghouz quotes in its reply, would be that of the origin [to clrghouz]).

The TID downstream (uplinks and other downlinks from clrghouz) would have clrghouz's ID in it, because it changed the message (normally adding additional SEEN-BYs and PATH).

I'm going to use these values to build up some stats to see if it can show who uses what...


....лоеп
--- SBBSecho 3.29-Linux
 * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (21:2/116)

.