Subj : FidoNG To : Avon From : Oli Date : Sat Sep 25 2021 07:40 am Avon wrote (2021-09-25): A> On 25 Sep 2021 at 03:34a, tenser pondered and said... te>> But we are talking about something that has no existing te>> precedence in the "FTN" world; "FSX" would be cool. A> I'm glad you said that because that's where I was going with it too. A> I understand what FTN is, means etc. I don't doubt that. Should I put everything in big tags next time? ;) A> I also know fsxNet has been set up A> to be experimental as part of it's reason to be, so I can't see why it A> should remain wholly as a FTN network. Who knows in years to come it A> might be a mix of a bunch of things, that would be kinda neat in my books A> :) I thought we were talking about the fido part and how to name the content-type of a fido packet. de>>> I guess "ftn" could be changed to "fido" - but keeping it short and de>>> suite. A>> I'd build it with 'fsx' in mind :) I'm still not sure what you mean by this. --- * Origin: 1995| Invention of the Cookie. The End. (21:3/102) .