Subj : Re: Is binkp/d's security model kaputt?
To   : Oli
From : tenser
Date : Sat Sep 25 2021 03:27 am

On 23 Sep 2021 at 04:15p, Oli pondered and said...
 
 Ol> There are no FTS-xxxx standards for packet formats in use ;). Only the
 Ol> legacy Type 2.0 packets (the one that doesn't support points) defined by
 Ol> FTS-0001.

I could have sworn I found some fidonet standardish type document
that described packet formats in some detail.  There were several;
oh, I guess I was looking at FSCs, which are not FTSs. Ok, so use
that as the content type....

 Ol> Timeout!
 Ol> 
 Ol> This is just wrong. It's application/json or maybe
 Ol> application/x-something or message/x-whatever.

It looks like RFC6838 backs you up there; I stand corrected.
`application/x-foo` seems more appropriate.

 Ol> And don't forget:
 Ol> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6648

Good point, but that's for new application protocols; we're
not talking about that, we're still using HTTP.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
 * Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)

.