Subj : Re: Changes to fsxNet
To   : Avon
From : Gamgee
Date : Sun Feb 16 2025 09:55 am

-=> Avon wrote to Gamgee <=-

 Ga> The above naming convention triggers an OCD-ish reaction for me...  :-)

 Av> You're not the only one :)

 Ga> Just wondering why three of the echo names are so different (in format)
 Ga> than the others...  Couldn't they be:
 Ga>
 Ga> FSX_RET
 Ga> FSX_GAM
 Ga> FSX_VID

 Av> Because it would mean essentially creating new echomail areas and I
 Av> don't want to impose that on folks.

Ahhh, yes, OK that makes sense.

 Ga> So that they match the "format" of all the others?  Haha!  Not a HUGE
 Ga> problem, but if we're re-arranging things anyway... why not?  ;-)

 Av> Back in the day all the echomail area tags I was creating were using
 Av> that FSX_XXX format but in more recent additions to echomail areas some
 Av> folks encouraged me (and I listened) to use tags that were more clearly
 Av> understandable/reflective of the content being carried by the echo.

 Av> So.. yeps I created a few such as the ones we're discussing... but I
 Av> think in the future any new ones I create will likely revert to the
 Av> older FSX_XXX convention...

Okay, fair enough!  Thanks for the explanation.

 Av> Yay for OCD :)

Haha!  Cheers.



.... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.23-Linux
 * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (21:2/138)

.