Subj : Re: NET 4 Stats
To   : AKAcastor
From : deon
Date : Sun Apr 07 2024 01:44 pm

  Re: Re: NET 4 Stats
  By: AKAcastor to Avon on Sat Apr 06 2024 11:16 am

Howdy,

 > Is there a difference between the nets within fsxNet?
 > My understanding is there's a hub for each net, and those within the net
 > receive echomail and files from their net's hub.  Are some hubs offering
 > different connection methods?  Are there other differences?

So I run Hub 3 - with something that I've created. My aim is self-service adminstration and to reduce some of the mundane activities required when running a distributed hub.

Since I've created it, I'm happy to look at different connection methods - with the core aim to preservice this hobby that we use, while taking advantage of any of today's latest technologies. If there is something that you want to try, I'm happy to take a look.

Currently implemented is IPv6 & IPv4 connectivity to BINKP, EMSI/Zmodem. You can use tor, zerotier, or TLS for any of those protocols. I'd even set up an API to get mail if there are others that would use it - and I'll probably do that when there is another clrhgouz hub...

I even started putting together a BBS frontend to clrghouz - styled on videotex (which is something that used to work on in my younger days) - but that's far from being usable...

I support all the different packet formats for bundled mail, as well as playing with new formats that help support a 5D FTN network, and/or accessing mail over low bandwidth links.


....лоеп
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
 * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (21:2/116)

.