Subj : Re: LA Fires
To   : Al
From : Gamgee
Date : Tue Jan 14 2025 04:19 pm

-=> Al wrote to Gamgee <=-

 >> What underbrush was warned about and not removed?

 > It's a pretty easy search term...  Here's one example:

 > https://nypost.com/2025/01/09/us-news/bass-newsom-ignored-past-warn
 > ings-about-a-wildfires/

 > There are plenty more.  Let me know if I can help you understand things
 > better.

 Al> Are you serious?

 Al> The New York Post is not a place to get facts. They publish stories.

 Al> The underbrush is not the problem. Search that.

Okay, I searched that *exact* wording, and found these:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2019/02/25/wildfires-caused-by-bad-environmental-policy-are-causing-california-forests-to-be-net-co2-emitters/

https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/416956-california-failed-to-sufficiently-manage-its-forests/

https://climatechangedispatch.com/why-california-doesnt-need-to-burn/

https://cei.org/opeds_articles/clearing-the-national-forests-underbrush-freeman-simmons-op-ed-in-raleigh-n-o/

Before you claim that I cherry-picked these articles to suit me, I will 
tell you that those were simply the first four hits to my search of "the 
underbrush is not the problem", as you suggested.  Do that search 
yourself, and see what you see.

I await your next response, but please try to NOT be political about it.



.... Never assume the obvious is true!
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.23-Linux
 * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (21:2/138)

.