Subj : Secure binkp
To   : Al
From : Oli
Date : Sun Nov 24 2019 06:12 pm

"Al -> Oli" <0@106.4.21> wrote:

 A> I'm going to hang on for a day or three and see if Alexey has
 A> anything to say about secure binkp and then I'll likely netmail him
 A> and see what (if anything) he has to say about it.

Alexey answered to your echomail. I'm still not sure what he meant with secure
binkp. Is it the CRYPT extension? It's not really "totally new technology", but
 never published by the FTSC. Or is there a new protocol in development?

Quote from FTSC_PUBLIC:

 AI>> I was thinking about this and the posibility of a standard so
 AI>> different mailers could use secure binkp.

 AV> JFYI: binkd already has this capability.

 AI>> Alexey said something about secure binkp that made me curious.

 AV> Yes. We needed a method for safe and secure peer-to-peer file
 AV> distribution:
 AV> 0. Looking like a completely different protocol.
 AV> 1. Immune to DPI (twice a fuck to Roscompozor).
 AV> 2. Almost impossible to ban
 AV>    (18446744073709551616 more fucks to Roscompozor).
 AV> 3. Capable of connection multiplexing on a single host:port pair.

End Quote

Anyway, my understanding is that there is no more secure and simple alternative
 to CRYPT in the making.

---
 * Origin:  (21:1/151)

.