Subj : Re: Anyone using PGP/GPG in here? To : Vk3jed From : StackFault Date : Thu Nov 08 2018 07:09 am Vk> St> I agree with you, I see myself rearranging my workflow on a frequent Vk> St> basis in the sake of optimization. Whenever I feel things are getting Vk> St> automatic, I change a little something just to keep my edge. Vk> Vk> With me, it depends. Simple, routine things need to be also Vk> streamlined. I have to keep those steps away from my conscious Vk> attention, because (1) that would be more error prone, and (2) over Vk> time, my aversion to fiddly work will caue me to use it less. Most Vk> crypto products have fallen into that. Two notable exceptions have been Vk> Enigmail on Tnnderbird, because I can activate that at the click of a Vk> button, and the old PGP wrapper that I used as my "editor" in the Vk> DOS/Bluewave days, which inserted itself into the workflow ell. I have a huge automation side, whatever can be automated is or will be at some point. The encryption however have always been a darker area, you don't want to automate it too much for a client based application. Passphrase is a good example, I like long passphrases just because it is faster to type as opposed to shorter passwords with symbols. Even if you automate it, you still need to type it, thus breaking the automation workflow. It can make things simpler to use however... These days, my GPG integration with Mutt is working very well, this is running smoothly but this is not for everyone... Setting it up can be a pain, luckily all my setups are scripted so it's a breeze now... It probably took me a full day to get it to a level I am happy with... ß Þ úúúÄÄÄÄÄúÄÄúúÄÄÄÄúÄú Ý ßúÄúÄÄÄúÄÄÄÄÄÄúúÄÄÄÄÄúÄÄÄÄúÄÄÄÄÄÄúúÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄúÄÄÄÄúúú Dave aka Stackfault ß Ýß bbs.bottomlessabyss.net (telnet/2023ússh/2222) Bottomless Abyss BBS ÜßÞ 21:1/172@fsxNet þ 1:249/317@FidoNet -úúú --- - - --- -- ú-úú ú úúú úúú ú- -úúú -ú-- úúú úúú -úúú -úúú úúú --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A39 2018/04/21 (Linux/64) * Origin: The Bottomless Abyss BBS (21:1/172) .