Subj : Re: JamNNTPd Corrupting Message Bases
To   : Accession
From : Carlos Navarro
Date : Wed Jan 17 2024 09:45 pm

17/01/2024 19:07, Accession wrote:

>   CN> Does your SmapiNNTPd use <z:n/f.p> or <p@f.n.z> addresses in the From
>   CN> field?
> 
> This message I'm replying to, and as you can see above "211/192 wrote", my From: field is showing 211/192.
> 
> Was this what was addressed in the v1.2 patch?

I think so. I just checked another sysop's JamNNTPd 1.0 server and it 
has exactly that same issue with the latest Thunderbird.

> Honestly, I haven't seen Thunderbird work with Jamnntpd in that regard for years.

Works fine with mine. It's JamNNTPd 1.3 (with a couple small patches), 
compiled for Win32.

Carlos
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
 * Origin: Zruspa's BBS - bbs.zruspas.org (21:1/192)

.