Subj : Re: binkd crypt
To   : tenser
From : NuSkooler
Date : Tue Jan 02 2024 07:27 pm


tenser around Wednesday, January 3rd...
 Te> Oh, I don't know: incremental progress towards security as a goal may be 
 Te> slow, but is still progress, no?

I'd argue that it's just a false sense of security, which can be worse than none.

If we were to implement a *new* protocol that is always encrypted, that would be a better start -- only policy can prevent people from exposing the messages elsewhere though + old setups will inherently be left out.






-- 
|08 ■ |12NuSkooler |06// |12Xibalba |08- |07"|06The place of fear|07"
|08 ■ |03xibalba|08.|03vip |08(|0344510|08/|03telnet|08, |0344511|08/|03ssh|08)
|08 ■ |03ENiGMA 1/2 WHQ |08| |03Phenom |08| |0367 |08| |03iMPURE |08| |03ACiDic
--- ENiGMA 1/2 v0.0.14-beta (linux; x64; 18.18.2)
 * Origin: Xibalba -+- xibalba.l33t.codes:44510 (21:1/121)

.